Literature DB >> 21384188

Which surgical procedure offers the best treatment for pilonidal disease?

Bariş Saylam1, Derya Nurhan Balli, Arife Polat Düzgün, M Vasfi Ozer, Faruk Coşkun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the most effective surgical procedure for treatment of pilonidal disease, by comparing different surgical techniques.
METHODS: A total of 354 patients who underwent operation for pilonidal disease were enrolled in this prospective study. The data included patient's demographic characteristics, age, gender, body mass index, occupation, smoking, concomitant diseases, surgeon's experience, wound-healing problems (wound separation and infection), time to return to work, and development of recurrence.
RESULTS: Of the 354 patients, total excision + primary closure was performed in 133 (37.6%), D-flap in 101 (28.5%), Karydakis technique in 74 (20.9%), and Limberg flap surgery in 46 (13%). The male/female ratio was 8.5:1, which is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The average follow-up period was 37 months (range, 12-97 months); during this period, wound-healing problems were observed in 70 (19.7%) patients, and 34 (9.6%) patients developed recurrence. There was no difference in the rate of recurrence of pilonidial disease between procedures done by trainees and staff surgeons. Recurrence rates were similar for all four treatment methods (7.5-13.5%). Wound-healing problems were higher for D-flap than for other methods (p = 0.027). The average time to return to work with the D-flap method was longer than that for the other methods (p < 0.01). Recurrence increased 14.44-fold following the development of wound infection. Higher recurrence rates were also noted in obese patients (8.10-fold) and in females (6.72-fold).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing volume of data on the treatment of pilonidal disease, the optimal treatment has yet to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384188     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0768-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  23 in total

1.  Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches.

Authors:  Sven Petersen; Rainer Koch; Sigmar Stelzner; Thomas-Peter Wendlandt; Klaus Ludwig
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Short-term results of Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  S Petersen; G Aumann; A Kramer; D Doll; M Sailer; G Hellmich
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Treatment of pilonidal sinus with primary closure. A twenty-year experience.

Authors:  Stefano Toccaceli; Luigi Persico Stella; Massimo Diana; Rossella Dandolo; Paolo Negro
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2008 May-Jun

4.  Cleft lift procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Ekmel Tezel; Hasan Bostanci; A Ziya Anadol; Osman Kurukahvecioglu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Theo Evers; Edouard Matevossian; Sven Petersen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Comparison of Karydakis flap reconstruction versus primary midline closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: results of 200 military service members.

Authors:  Mehmet Fatih Can; Mert Mahsuni Sevinc; Mehmet Yilmaz
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with rhomboid flap.

Authors:  K Topgül
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Reconstruction following excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with a perforator-based fasciocutaneous Limberg flap.

Authors:  Abdou M A Darwish; A Hassanin
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Day-case Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  John H Anderson; Christina O Yip; J S Nagabhushan; Sheila J Connelly
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V-Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Tarik Zafer Nursal; Ali Ezer; Kenan Calişkan; Nurkan Törer; Sedat Belli; Gökhan Moray
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  6 in total

1.  Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  K Arslan; S Said Kokcam; H Koksal; E Turan; A Atay; O Dogru
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Idea and innovation: Secure fixation between dermis and periosteum using perforator flap to prevent recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Li-Ying Liao; Tzong-Shiun Li; Hung Chi Chen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of depression, anxiety and long-term quality of health in patients with a history of either primary closure or Limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Kazim Duman; Yavuz Ozdemir; Ergun Yucel; Mehmet L Akin
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Sinus pilonidalis in patients of German military hospitals: a review.

Authors:  Janina Kueper; Theo Evers; Kai Wietelmann; Dietrich Doll; Jana Roffeis; Philipp Schwabe; Sven Märdian; Florian Wichlas; Björn-Dirk Krapohl
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2015-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.