Literature DB >> 31848678

Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial.

Mujgan Caliskan1, Koray Kosmaz2, Ismail Ege Subasi2, Aylin Acar2, Ismail Evren3, Gurhan Bas4, Ali Timucin Atayoglu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pilonidal disease is a common problem in primary health care which may require immediate surgical referral. Although various management options have been proposed, so far there is no gold standard treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine which of the following techniques was superior as regards postoperative complications and recurrence, midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap or Karydakis flap.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Department of General Surgery. Patients with non-complicated pilonidal sinus were enrolled in the study from April 2009 to January 2012. All patients were randomized the day of surgery at the coordinating center by means of a computer program. Patients were randomized to receive midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap or Karydakis flap. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and patients were discharged 6 h after surgery. Demographic characteristics, skin color, body hair type, family history, preoperative complaints and duration of symptoms, cyst size, intraoperative iatrogenic cyst rupture, the presence of a tuft of hairs in the cyst, surgical techniques, duration of drainage, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrence were evaluated.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients with non-complicated pilonidal sinus were enrolled. Seventy-two patients were randomized to midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, 67 patients to midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap and 53 patients to Karydakis flap. The mean age was 25.66 ± 7.67 years. At 76-month follow-up, the overall complications and recurrence rates were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In cases of non-complicated pilonidal sinus, we recommend surgical management using local anesthesia, outpatient surgery and the surgical approach with which the surgeon is most familiar.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31848678     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05331-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  Sacral adipofascial turn-over flap for the excisional defect of pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  K Onishi; Y Maruyama
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process.

Authors:  G E Karydakis
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1992-05

Review 3.  Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iain J D McCallum; Peter M King; Julie Bruce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-07

4.  Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  K Arslan; S Said Kokcam; H Koksal; E Turan; A Atay; O Dogru
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  A new technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  S A Obeid
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Samer S Bessa
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Tracy L Hull; James Wu
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  J A Surrell
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complications and recurrence.

Authors:  Akin Onder; Sadullah Girgin; Murat Kapan; Mehmet Toker; Zulfu Arikanoglu; Yilmaz Palanci; Bilsel Bac
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

10.  Excision and marsupialization versus sinus excision for the treatment of limited chronic pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Oncel; N Kurt; M Kement; E Colak; M Eser; H Uzun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  2 in total

1.  Excision and suture in the midline versus Karydakis flap surgery for pilonidal sinus: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Oskar Hemmingsson; Felix Binnermark; Christoffer Odensten; Martin Rutegård; Karl A Franklin; Markku M Haapamäki
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

2.  Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siwei Bi; Kaibo Sun; Shanshan Chen; Jun Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.