| Literature DB >> 19358732 |
Aibin Zhan1, Cheng Li, Jinzhong Fu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amphibians in general are poor dispersers and highly philopatric, and landscape features often have important impacts on their population genetic structure and dispersal patterns. Numerous studies have suggested that genetic differentiation among amphibian populations are particularly pronounced for populations separated by mountain ridges. The Tsinling Mountain range of northern China is a major mountain chain that forms the boundary between the Oriental and Palearctic zoogeographic realms. We studied the population structure of the Chinese wood frog (Rana chensinensis) to test whether the Tsinling Mountains and the nearby Daba Mountains impose major barriers to gene flow.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19358732 PMCID: PMC2679764 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1Sampling sites of the Chinese wood frog (. Sampling site names are listed in Table 1. Sites 1–5 are located at the northern side of the Tsinling; sites 6–9 are located at the southern side of the Tsingling, which is also the northern side of the Daba; sites 10–12 are located at the southern side of the Daba. Sites 11 and 12 are located at the periphery of the species' distribution. Insert: outline of China; the blue block indicates the relative location of the studying area and the dashed line indicates the species' distribution.
Collection information for the Chinese wood frog (Rana chensinensis)
| Site number | Sample locality | Elevation (a.s.l.) | Coordinates | |
| 1 | Shangyinjiapo, Laoyu Subco, Hu Co, Shaanxi Province | 1600 m | N33.98795° E108.50748° | 37 |
| 2 | Xiayinjiapo, Laoyu Subco, Hu Co, Shaanxi Province | 688 m | N33.96634° E108.51907° | 26 |
| 3 | Tangyu, Meixian Co, Shaanxi Province | 560 m | N34.18070° E107.82583° | 50 |
| 4 | Shigu, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province | 775 m | N34.29952° E107.14037° | 50 |
| 5 | Banfangzi, Zhouzhi Co, Shaanxi Province | 1149 m | N33.80635° E107.99083° | 35 |
| 6 | Xichahe, Foping Co, Shaanxi Province | 1100 m | N33.45655° E107.96894° | 48 |
| 7 | Huayang, Yang Co, Shaanxi Province | 1100 m | N33.57588° E107.55029° | 45 |
| 8 | Fengxian, Fengxian Co, Shaanxi Province | 954 m | N33.90088° E106.53301° | 50 |
| 9 | Lueyang, Lueyang Co, Shaanxi Province | 816 m | N33.26540° E106.24962° | 50 |
| 10 | Bikou, Wen Co, Gansu Province | 687 m | N32.72133° E105.22530° | 32 |
| 11 | Tangjiahe, Qingchuan Co, Sichuan Province | 1442 m | N32.57795° E104.75372° | 50 |
| 12 | Wanglang, Pingwu Co, Sichuan Province | 2480 m | N32.90927° E104.15594° | 50 |
N = sample size
P-values for the exact test of difference in allelic richness (below diagonal) and expected heterozygosity (above diagonal) using a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U test).
| Site | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | ----- | 0.891 | 0.312 | 0.059 | 0.082 | 0.239 | 0.098 | 0.392 | 0.892 | 0.404 | 0.002 | |
| 2 | 0.537 | ----- | 0.198 | 0.183 | 0.301 | 0.398 | 0.113 | 0.491 | 0.899 | 0.309 | 0.014 | |
| 3 | 0.388 | 0.361 | ----- | 0.381 | 0.372 | 0.100 | 0.059 | 0.902 | 0.409 | 0.118 | ||
| 4 | 0.281 | 0.211 | 0.400 | ----- | 0.194 | 0.201 | 0.190 | 0.592 | 0.113 | 0.102 | ||
| 5 | 0.452 | 0.092 | 0.069 | 0.007 | ----- | 0.623 | 0.389 | 0.223 | 0.223 | 0.903 | 0.287 | |
| 6 | 0.923 | 0.981 | 0.291 | 0.063 | 0.059 | ----- | 0.409 | 0.121 | 0.620 | 0.861 | ||
| 7 | 0.472 | 0.194 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.401 | 0.081 | ----- | 0.059 | 0.099 | 0.303 | 0.030 | 0.503 |
| 8 | 0.194 | 0.052 | 0.701 | 0.798 | 0.104 | 0.102 | ----- | 0.291 | 0.101 | |||
| 9 | 0.402 | 0.312 | 0.780 | 0.099 | 0.084 | 0.210 | 0.100 | 0.423 | ----- | 0.444 | 0.009 | |
| 10 | 0.092 | 0.119 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.901 | 0.083 | 0.582 | 0.079 | ----- | 0.305 | ||
| 11 | ----- | |||||||||||
| 12 | 0.014 | 0.099 | 0.003 | 0.401 | 0.032 | 0.104 | ----- |
Bold numbers indicate statistical significance after sequential Bonferroni corrections.
Figure 2Correlation between geographical distance in kilometers (x-axis) and genetic distance given as . The empty diamonds represent the site-pairs among all sampling sites and the solid diamonds represent the site-pairs among the nine sites immediately north or south of the Tsinling range. The dashed line represents the linear regression using data derived from all sites and the solid line represents the linear regression using data derived from the nine Tsinling sites (sites 1 – 9).
Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA).
| A | Source of variation | Sum of square | Variance components | Percentage variation | |
| Among groups | 272.039 | 0.24305 | 4.25577 | < 0.00001 | |
| Among sites within groups | 478.176 | 0.57788 | 10.11878 | < 0.00001 | |
| Within populations | 4899.441 | 4.89003 | 85.62546 | < 0.00001 | |
| Total | 5649.656 | 5.71096 | |||
| B | Source of variation | Sum of square | Variance components | Percentage variation | |
| Among groups | 147.848 | 0.16706 | 2.91249 | < 0.00001 | |
| Among sites within groups | 266.329 | 0.39323 | 6.85549 | < 0.00001 | |
| Among individuals within sites | 4202.064 | 5.17572 | 90.23202 | < 0.00001 | |
| Total | 4616.242 | 5.73601 | |||
Sites are separated into three groups under the hypothesis that the Tsinling and Daba Mountains present significant barriers to gene flow. A: analysis includes all 12 sites; group 1 = sites for north of the Tsinling Mountains (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), and group 2 = sites from south of the Tsinling Mountains (6, 7, 8 and 9), and group 3 = sites from south of the Daba Mountains (10, 11 and 12). B: analysis includes only the 10 central sites; group 1 = sites 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, group 2 = sites 6, 7, 8 and 9, and group 3 = site 10.
Figure 3Genetic barriers predicted by BARRIER (version 2.2). The genetic barriers are shown in bold lines with arrows. A: genetic barrier predication using the data from all sites (1 – 12); B: genetic barrier predication using the data from the ten central populations (1 – 10); C: genetic barrier prediction using the data from the nine Tsinling populations (1 – 9).