| Literature DB >> 22957202 |
N Oromi, A Richter-Boix, D Sanuy, J Fibla.
Abstract
Across altitudinal and latitudinal gradients, the proportion of suitable habitats varies, influencing the individual dispersal that ultimately can produce differentiation among populations. The natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) is distributed across a wide geographic range that qualifies the species as interesting for a geographic analysis of its genetic variability. Five populations of B. calamita in the Sierra de Gredos (Spain) were studied in an altitudinal gradient ranging from 750 to 2270 m using microsatellite markers. In addition, we analyzed the latitudinal genetic variation in B. calamita within a global European distribution using genetic diversity parameters (mean number of alleles per locus [M(a)] and expected heterozygosity [H(E)]) obtained from our results and those published in the literature. The low level of genetic differentiation found between populations of B. calamita (F(st) ranging from 0.0115 to 0.1018) and the decreases in genetic diversity with altitude (M(a) from 13.6 to 8.3, H(E) from 0.82 to 0.74) can be interpreted by the combined effects of discontinuous habitat, produced mainly by the high slopes barriers and geographic distance. In the latitudinal gradient, genetic diversity decreases from south to north as a consequence of the colonization of the species from the Pleistocene refugium. We conclude that the genetic variability in B. calamita along its wide altitudinal and latitudinal geographic distribution mainly reflects the colonization history of the species after the last glacial period.Entities:
Keywords: Altitudinal and latitudinal gradient; Bufo calamita; genetic diversity; microsatellite markers
Year: 2012 PMID: 22957202 PMCID: PMC3434004 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1A detailed photography of a male individual of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita, in the studied zone of Sierra de Gredos (Spain).
Figure 2Gredos mountain map of elevation including the location of the five populations considered in this study.
Figure 3Genetic diversity and altitude relationship. Mean expected heterozygosity (a) and allelic richness (b) for each population. Each point represents a population sample. Confidence limit (95%) is shown in the figure.
Molecular analysis of variance (AMOVA) at Sierra de Gredos populations
| Source | df | SS | Varcomp | % Var |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 2 | 23.66 | 0.053 | 2.69 |
| Among populations within groups | 2 | 10.58 | 0.046 | 2.35 |
| Within populations | 369 | 693.90 | 1.880 | 94.96 |
| Total | 373 | 728.15 | 1.980 | 100 |
df, degree freedom; SS, sum of squares; Varcomp, variance components; % Var, proportion of total variance attributable to each source.
Figure 4Genetic diversity and latitude relationship. Mean expected heterozygosity (a) and allelic richness (b) for each population. Each point represents a population of this study and compiled from literature (see Supporting Table S2 for details).
Figure 5Genetic diversity and latitude relationship. The separately analysis considering the Iberian Peninsula as the glacial refuge. Mean expected heterozygosity (a) and mean number of alleles per locus (b). Each point (black circles, Iberian populations; white squares, northern populations) represents a population.