BACKGROUND: A secure tibial press fit technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions may be a relevant alternative to common techniques because no hardware is necessary. Up to the present point in time no biomechanical data exist for a tibial press fit posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. This study compares the biomechanical properties of hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts using a press fit technique with those of an interference screw fixation. METHODS: Quadriceps and hamstring tendons of 20 human cadavers (age 49.2±18.5 years) were used. A press fit fixation with a knot in the semitendinosus tendon (K) and a quadriceps tendon bone block graft (Q) were compared to an interference screw fixation (I) in 27 porcine tibiae. In each group, nine constructs were cyclically stretched and then loaded until failure. Maximum load to failure, stiffness and elongation during failure testing and cyclical loading were investigated. RESULTS: The maximum load to failure was 518±157 N (387-650 N) for the K group, 558±119 N (466-650 N) for the I group and 620±102 N (541-699 N) for the Q group. The stiffness was 55±27 N/mm (18-89 N/mm) for the K group, 117±62 N/mm (69-165 N/mm) for the I group and 65±21 N/mm (49-82 N/mm) for the Q group. The stiffness of the I group was significantly larger (ANOVA on ranks, P=0.01). The elongation during cyclical loading was significantly larger for all groups from the 1st to the 5th cycle compared to the elongation in between the 5th and the 20th cycle (P<0.03). CONCLUSION: All techniques exhibited larger elongation during initial loading. Load to failure and stiffness were significantly different between the fixations. The Q fixation showed equal biomechanical properties compared to a pure tendon fixation (I) with an interference screw. The results of group K were inferior. All three investigated fixation techniques exhibit comparable biomechanical properties. Preconditioning of the constructs is critical. Future randomized, clinical trials have to investigate the biological effectiveness of these fixation techniques.
BACKGROUND: A secure tibial press fit technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions may be a relevant alternative to common techniques because no hardware is necessary. Up to the present point in time no biomechanical data exist for a tibial press fit posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. This study compares the biomechanical properties of hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts using a press fit technique with those of an interference screw fixation. METHODS: Quadriceps and hamstring tendons of 20 human cadavers (age 49.2±18.5 years) were used. A press fit fixation with a knot in the semitendinosus tendon (K) and a quadriceps tendon bone block graft (Q) were compared to an interference screw fixation (I) in 27 porcine tibiae. In each group, nine constructs were cyclically stretched and then loaded until failure. Maximum load to failure, stiffness and elongation during failure testing and cyclical loading were investigated. RESULTS: The maximum load to failure was 518±157 N (387-650 N) for the K group, 558±119 N (466-650 N) for the I group and 620±102 N (541-699 N) for the Q group. The stiffness was 55±27 N/mm (18-89 N/mm) for the K group, 117±62 N/mm (69-165 N/mm) for the I group and 65±21 N/mm (49-82 N/mm) for the Q group. The stiffness of the I group was significantly larger (ANOVA on ranks, P=0.01). The elongation during cyclical loading was significantly larger for all groups from the 1st to the 5th cycle compared to the elongation in between the 5th and the 20th cycle (P<0.03). CONCLUSION: All techniques exhibited larger elongation during initial loading. Load to failure and stiffness were significantly different between the fixations. The Q fixation showed equal biomechanical properties compared to a pure tendon fixation (I) with an interference screw. The results of group K were inferior. All three investigated fixation techniques exhibit comparable biomechanical properties. Preconditioning of the constructs is critical. Future randomized, clinical trials have to investigate the biological effectiveness of these fixation techniques.
Authors: Janne T Nurmi; Harri Sievänen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen; Teppo L N Järvinen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004 Apr-May Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: John A Bergfeld; Scott M Graham; Richard D Parker; Antonio D C Valdevit; Helen E Kambic Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 6.202