Literature DB >> 19357360

Reliability of noncontact pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Miguel J Maldonado1, Alberto López-Miguel, Juan C Nieto, Juan Cano-Parra, Begoña Calvo, Jorge L Alió.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by combined scanning-slit/Placido-disc topography (Orbscan II; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to compare the results with another noncontact method, specular microscopy (SP-2000P; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan).
METHODS: To analyze intrasession repeatability, one examiner measured 22 postmyopic LASIK eyes 10 times successively in the shortest time possible, using both devices randomly. To study intersession reproducibility, the same operator obtained measurements from another 50 eyes with stable refraction in two consecutive visits at the same time of the day between 6 and 9 months after myopic LASIK. Any association between residual stromal bed thickness and measurement variability was recorded and evaluated.
RESULTS: For intrasession repeatability, Orbscan II and Topcon SP-2000P CCT measurements showed a repeatability of 20.2 (4.3%) and 12.8 (2.6%) microm, respectively. Both devices yielded excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; 0.98 and 0.99, respectively). For intersession reproducibility, no difference in CCT measurements was found. The coefficient of intersession reproducibility were 6.7% (29.5 microm) for Orbscan II and 4.3% (19.5 microm) for Topcon SP-2000P CCT measurements. The ICCs (0.95 and 0.96, respectively) indicated good intersession reliability. Repeatability and reproducibility with both devices were unrelated to stromal bed thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: Both noncontact pachymeters provide repeatable CCT measurements in transparent postmyopic LASIK corneas after the early postoperative period. Intersession variations in CCT of more than 29 microm with the Orbscan II and 19 microm with the Topcon SP-2000P may reflect true corneal change. These estimates should help investigators and clinicians differentiate actual CCT modification from measurement variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19357360     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  5 in total

1.  Letter to the editor. "Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery".

Authors:  Alberto López-Miguel; María Sanchidrián; Itziar Fernández; Alfredo Holgueras; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Accutome PachPen handheld ultrasonic pachymeter: intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility by personnel of different training grades.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Peyman; Lai Yong Tai; Keat Ween Khaw; Choung Min Ng; Maung Maung Win; Visvaraja Subrayan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Scanning-slit topography in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  László Módis; Gábor Németh; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsa Flaskó; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Assessment of postnatal corneal development in the C57BL/6 mouse using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microwave-assisted histology.

Authors:  Samuel D Hanlon; Nimesh B Patel; Alan R Burns
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes.

Authors:  Ayong Yu; Weiqi Zhao; Giacomo Savini; Zixu Huang; Fangjun Bao; Weicong Lu; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.