Literature DB >> 16927516

Improving speech intelligibility in background noise with an adaptive directional microphone.

Peter J Blamey1, Hayley J Fiket, Brenton R Steele.   

Abstract

Omnidirectional, supercardioid, and adaptive directional microphones (ADM) were evaluated in combination with the ADRO amplification scheme for eight participants with moderate sloping hearing losses. The ADM produced better speech perception scores than the other two microphones in all noise conditions. Participants performed the Hearing in Noise Test sentences at -4.5 dB SNR or better, which is similar to the level achievable with normal hearing. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale indicated no disadvantages of using the ADM relative to the omnidirectional microphone in real-life situations. The ADM was preferred over the omnidirectional microphone in 54% of situations, compared to 17% preferences for the omnidirectional microphone, and 29% no preference. The combination of the ADM to improve SNR, and ADRO to keep the signal output comfortable and audible provided near-normal hearing performance for people with moderate hearing loss. The ADM is the recommended microphone configuration for ADRO hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16927516     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.7.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  Digital hearing AIDS from the perspective of one consumer/audiologist.

Authors:  Mark Ross
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

2.  A low-noise differential microphone inspired by the ears of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  R N Miles; Q Su; W Cui; M Shetye; F L Degertekin; B Bicen; C Garcia; S Jones; N Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Micromachined piezoelectric microphones with in-plane directivity.

Authors:  Michael L Kuntzman; Jia Gloria Lee; Nishshanka N Hewa-Kasakarage; Donghwan Kim; Neal A Hall
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.

Authors:  Alison M Brockmeyer; Lisa G Potts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) in Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Raiza Gorbachev Ribeiro Aguiar; Katia de Almeida; Elisiane Crestani de Miranda-Gonsalez
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

6.  Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Syed Shabih Hasan; Sean DeVries; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A Practical Tablet-Based Hearing Aid Configuration as an Exemplar Project for Students of Instrumentation.

Authors:  Ricardo Simeoni
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-06-26

8.  Directivity and noise reduction in hearing aids: speech perception and benefit.

Authors:  Camila Angélica Quintino; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Déborah Viviane Ferrari
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.