Literature DB >> 16599958

Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Jonas Eriksson1, Heike Siedel, Dieter Lukas, Manfred Kayser, Axel Erler, Chie Hashimoto, Gottfried Hohmann, Christophe Boesch, Linda Vigilant.   

Abstract

Dispersal is a rare event that is difficult to observe in slowly maturing, long-lived wild animal species such as the bonobo. In this study we used sex-linked (mitochondrial DNA sequence and Y-chromosome microsatellite) markers from the same set of individuals to estimate the magnitude of difference in effective dispersal between the sexes and to investigate the long-term demographic history of bonobos. We sampled 34 males from four distinct geographical areas across the bonobo distribution range. As predicted for a female-dispersing species, we found much higher levels of differentiation among local bonobo populations based upon Y-chromosomal than mtDNA genetic variation. Specifically, almost all of the Y-chromosomal variation distinguished populations, while nearly all of the mtDNA variation was shared between populations. Furthermore, genetic distance correlated with geographical distance for mtDNA but not for the Y chromosome. Female bonobos have a much higher migration rate and/or effective population size as compared to males, and the estimate for the mitochondrial TMRCA (time to most recent common ancestor) was approximately 10 times greater than the estimate for the Y chromosome (410,000 vs. 40,000-45,000). For humans the difference is merely a factor of two, suggesting a more stable demographic history in bonobos in comparison to humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16599958     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02845.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  30 in total

1.  Estimators of the human effective sex ratio detect sex biases on different timescales.

Authors:  Leslie S Emery; Joseph Felsenstein; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  The Y chromosomes of the great apes.

Authors:  Pille Hallast; Mark A Jobling
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Effects of Pleistocene glaciations and rivers on the population structure of Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Authors:  Natasha Arora; Alexander Nater; Carel P van Schaik; Erik P Willems; Maria A van Noordwijk; Benoit Goossens; Nadja Morf; Meredith Bastian; Cheryl Knott; Helen Morrogh-Bernard; Noko Kuze; Tomoko Kanamori; Joko Pamungkas; Dyah Perwitasari-Farajallah; Ernst Verschoor; Kristin Warren; Michael Krützen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetics of the Shimokita macaque population suggest an ancient bottleneck.

Authors:  Yoshi Kawamoto; Ken-ichiro Tomari; Shizuka Kawai; Sakie Kawamoto
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Deep divergence and apparent sex-biased dispersal revealed by a Y-linked marker in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Joseph P Brunelli; Craig A Steele; Gary H Thorgaard
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Social bonds in the dispersing sex: partner preferences among adult female chimpanzees.

Authors:  Steffen Foerster; Karen McLellan; Kara Schroepfer-Walker; Carson M Murray; Christopher Krupenye; Ian C Gilby; Anne E Pusey
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Y chromosomal variation tracks the evolution of mating systems in chimpanzee and bonobo.

Authors:  Felix Schaller; Antonio M Fernandes; Christine Hodler; Claudia Münch; Juan J Pasantes; Wolfram Rietschel; Werner Schempp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study.

Authors:  Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 10.  Using genetics to understand the dynamics of wild primate populations.

Authors:  Linda Vigilant; Katerina Guschanski
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 2.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.