| Literature DB >> 19352437 |
Philip W Jordan1, Nigel J Saunders.
Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis requires iron, and in the absence of iron alters its gene expression to increase iron acquisition and to make the best use of the iron it has. During different stages of colonization and infection available iron sources differ, particularly the host iron-binding proteins haemoglobin, transferrin, and lactoferrin. This study compared the transcriptional responses of N. meningitidis, when grown in the presence of these iron donors and ferric iron, using microarrays.Specific transcriptional responses to the different iron sources were observed, including genes that are not part of the response to iron restriction. Comparisons between growth on haemoglobin and either transferrin or lactoferrin identified changes in 124 and 114 genes, respectively, and 33 genes differed between growth on transferrin or lactoferrin. Comparison of gene expression from growth on haemoglobin or ferric iron showed that transcription is also affected by the entry of either haem or ferric iron into the cytoplasm. This is consistent with a model in which N. meningitidis uses the relative availability of host iron donor proteins as niche indicators.Growth in the presence of haemoglobin is associated with a response likely to be adaptive to survival within the bloodstream, which is supported by serum killing assays that indicate growth on haemoglobin significantly increases survival, and the response to lactoferrin is associated with increased expression of epithelial cell adhesins and oxidative stress response molecules. The transferrin receptor is the most highly transcribed receptor and has the fewest genes specifically induced in its presence, suggesting this is the favoured iron source for the bacterium. Most strikingly, the responses to haemoglobin, which is associated with unrestricted growth, indicates a low iron transcriptional profile, associated with an aggressive phenotype that may be adaptive to access host iron sources but which may also underlie the lethal features of meningococcal septicaemia, when haemoglobin may become a major source of iron.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19352437 PMCID: PMC2662411 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Mechanisms of iron acquisition from the host by N. meningitidis MC58.
Ferric iron can be acquired directly, or obtained from transferrin or lactoferrin via the cognate receptors, TbpAB and LbpAB respectively [18], [99]. Haem can be acquired from haemoglobin via the haemoglobin receptor; HmbR [25]. Xeno-siderophores may also be internalized through the FetA receptor [100]. Transport through the inner membrane is via the FbpABC proteins for ferric iron [34]–[36], and by as yet undefined mechanisms for the other iron sources.
Figure 2Microarray experimental design to identify the transcriptional effects of growth on the iron sources haemoglobin, transferrin, and lactoferrin.
Numbers of genes changed greater than 1.5 fold in comparisons between Hb, Tf and Lf.
| Cyber-T | |||
| Comparison | Total | of which not present in the + / − iron response | Consistent |
| Tf | 97 | 42 | 36 |
| : Hb | 180 | 82 | 58 |
| Hb | 105 | 51 | 21 |
| : Lf | 88 | 63 | 25 |
| Tf | 35 | 28 | 16 |
| : Lf | 11 | 5 | 1 |
The numbers correspond to genes up-regulated in the presence of the particular iron source in each comparison.
These genes had a significance of p<0.05 in the CyberT test.
This column shows the genes that are only changed in response to the iron source. The genes that are regulated as a result of differential iron uptake are excluded from this column. This is described in more detail in the text.
This column shows the number of genes that were changed in one direction in all biological replicates.
Transcriptional regulators changed in one or more comparisons.
| Regulator | Fold Ratio Hb/Tf | Fold Ratio Hb/Lf | Fold Ratio Tf/Lf |
| Nitrogen regulation protein NtrY (NMB0114) | No data | NS | 2.7, |
| Transcriptional regulator, TetR family (NMB0810) | 0.5, | 0.6, | NS |
| Transcriptional regulator, AraC family (NMB1967) | 2.7, | NS | NS |
| Fur (NMB0205) | 1.7, | 1.8, | NS |
| FarR (NMB1843) | 1.7, | 1.3, | NS |
| NarQ (NMB1249) | 1.6, | 1.6, | NS |
| Repressor protein (NMB0556) | 0.5, | 0.5, | NS |
| Transcriptional regulator (NMB1007) | NS | 1.5, | NS |
NS: Not significant.
Summary of the numbers of genes that are changed in either the Hb vs. Tf comparison or the Hb vs. Hb&Tf comparison and the observed response in other comparison.
| Hb | ||||
|
| Up | Unchanged | Down | |
| Up | 12 | 16 | 8 | |
| Unchanged | 89 | - | 35 | |
| Down | 28 | 34 | 5 | |
This table highlights the limited overlap between the observed responses of the Hb vs. Tf comparison and the Hb vs. Hb&Tf comparison.
Figure 3Serum bactericidal assay showing the effects of growth of N. meningitidis on RBM agar containing Hb, Tf, or Lf and subsequent treatment with 5% NHS.
The percentage survival is the average number of CFUs remaining compared to controls in which complement was heat inactivated. Values are the mean of at least seven determinations in triplicate±SEM.
CyberT values for analysis of individual comparisons.
| Comparison | Sliding window size | Bayes confidence estimate |
| Hb | 77 | 12 |
| Hb | 77 | 15 |
| Tf | 91 | 15 |
| Hb | 71 | 12 |
| Hb | 101 | 12 |