Literature DB >> 10910161

Theoretical modeling of the effects of shock duration, frequency, and strength on the degree of electroporation.

A O Bilska1, K A DeBruin, W Krassowska.   

Abstract

Electroporation is becoming an increasingly important tool for introducing biologically active compounds into living cells, yet the effectiveness of this technique can be low, particularly in vivo. One way to improve the success rate is to optimize the shock protocols, but experimental studies are costly, time consuming, and yield only an indirect measurement of pore creation. Alternatively, this study models electroporation in two geometries, a space-clamped membrane and a single cell, and investigates the effects of pulse duration, frequency, shape, and strength. The creation of pores is described by a first order differential equation derived from the Smoluchowski equation. Both the membrane and the cell are exposed to monophasic and biphasic shocks of varying duration (membrane, 10 micros-100 s; cell, 0.1 micros-200 ms) and to trains of monophasic and biphasic pulses of varying frequency (membrane, 50 Hz-4 kHz; cell, 200 kHz-6 MHz). The effectiveness of each shock is measured by the fractional pore area (FPA). The results indicate that FPA is sensitive to shock duration only in a very narrow range (membrane, approximately 1 ms; cell, approximately 0.25 micros). In contrast, FPA is sensitive to shock strength and frequency of the pulse train, increasing linearly with shock strength and decreasing slowly with frequency. In all cases, monophasic shocks were at least as effective as biphasic shocks, implying that varying the strength and frequency of a monophasic pulse train is the most effective way to control the creation of pores.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10910161     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-4598(00)00066-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  8 in total

1.  Nanometer-Scale Permeabilization and Osmotic Swelling Induced by 5-ns Pulsed Electric Fields.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Stefania Romeo; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Numerical calculations of single-cell electroporation with an electrolyte-filled capillary.

Authors:  Imants Zudans; Aparna Agarwal; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Mechanistic analysis of electroporation-induced cellular uptake of macromolecules.

Authors:  David A Zaharoff; Joshua W Henshaw; Brian Mossop; Fan Yuan
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2008-01

4.  Modeling of Transmembrane Potential in Realistic Multicellular Structures before Electroporation.

Authors:  Tomo Murovec; Daniel C Sweeney; Eduardo Latouche; Rafael V Davalos; Christian Brosseau
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A theoretical study of single-cell electroporation in a microchannel.

Authors:  Saeid Movahed; Dongqing Li
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Spatially variant red blood cell crenation in alternating current non-uniform fields.

Authors:  Ran An; David O Wipf; Adrienne R Minerick
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Single-cell transfection by electroporation using an electrolyte/plasmid-filled capillary.

Authors:  Manyan Wang; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Electroporation-induced electrosensitization.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.