Literature DB >> 19351137

Should urine pH be adjusted prior to gel-based proteome analysis?

Visith Thongboonkerd1, Siriwan Mungdee, Wararat Chiangjong.   

Abstract

The urine has become one of the most widely used clinical samples for biomarker discovery. The pH of human urine may vary largely from 4.5 to 8.0. Previously, it was questionable whether the urine pH would affect proteome analysis and whether the urine pH needed to be adjusted prior to proteome analysis remained unclear. We therefore performed a systematic analysis of the effect of urine pH on proteome profile. Midstream second morning and random afternoon urine samples were collected from 5 males and 5 females who were healthy and had no recent medication. After removal of cells and debris by low-speed centrifugation, pH levels of individual samples were measured and urinary proteins were isolated by 75% ethanol precipitation. Equally loaded 100 microg of proteins from individual samples were resolved in 2-DE (linear pH 3-10) and visualized with SYPRO Ruby fluorescence stain. There was no significant correlation between difference in the morning versus afternoon urine pH (DeltapH) and %match of protein spots derived from morning versus afternoon urine samples in individual samples (Pearson's r = 0.074; p = 0.839). In parallel, all individual samples with equal volume were pooled. The pH of the pooled urine was adjusted to 4-10 and urinary proteome profiles were analyzed as for individual samples. ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc multiple comparisons showed no significant differences in total number of detected spots and %match among various pH levels. Our data suggest that the urine pH has no significant effects on urinary proteome profile and thus needs no adjustment prior to gel-based proteome analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19351137     DOI: 10.1021/pr900127x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  12 in total

1.  One-step sample concentration, purification, and albumin depletion method for urinary proteomics.

Authors:  Ali R Vaezzadeh; Andrew C Briscoe; Hanno Steen; Richard S Lee
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  Urine collection and processing for protein biomarker discovery and quantification.

Authors:  C Eric Thomas; Wade Sexton; Kaaron Benson; Rebecca Sutphen; John Koomen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Optimized sample preparation of endoscopic collected pancreatic fluid for SDS-PAGE analysis.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Linda S Lee; Bechien Wu; Kathryn Repas; Peter A Banks; Darwin L Conwell; Hanno Steen
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Comprehensive human urine standards for comparability and standardization in clinical proteome analysis.

Authors:  Harald Mischak; Walter Kolch; Michalis Aivaliotis; David Bouyssié; Magali Court; Hassan Dihazi; Gry H Dihazi; Julia Franke; Jérôme Garin; Anne Gonzalez de Peredo; Alexander Iphöfer; Lothar Jänsch; Chrystelle Lacroix; Manousos Makridakis; Christophe Masselon; Jochen Metzger; Bernard Monsarrat; Michal Mrug; Martin Norling; Jan Novak; Andreas Pich; Andrew Pitt; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Justyna Siwy; Hitoshi Suzuki; Visith Thongboonkerd; Li-Shun Wang; Jérôme Zoidakis; Petra Zürbig; Joost P Schanstra; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Proteomic profiling of urine: implications for lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Najla Aljaberi; Michael Bennett; Hermine I Brunner; Prasad Devarajan
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.940

6.  Recent Advances in Supramolecular Affinity Separations: Affinity Chromatography and Related Methods.

Authors:  Ashley G Woolfork; Sazia Iftekhar; Susan Ovbude; Kyungah Suh; Sadia Sharmeen; Isaac Kyei; Jacob Jones; David S Hage
Journal:  Adv Chromatogr       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 0.400

7.  A standardized and reproducible urine preparation protocol for cancer biomarkers discovery.

Authors:  Julia Beretov; Valerie C Wasinger; Peter Schwartz; Peter H Graham; Yong Li
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2014-11-03

8.  Systematic evaluation for effects of urine pH on calcium oxalate crystallization, crystal-cell adhesion and internalization into renal tubular cells.

Authors:  Juthatip Manissorn; Kedsarin Fong-Ngern; Paleerath Peerapen; Visith Thongboonkerd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Candidate Urine Peptide Biomarkers for IgA Nephropathy: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Karolina Marek-Bukowiec; Andrzej Konieczny; Krzysztof Ratajczyk; Wojciech Witkiewicz
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Identification of Osteoporosis-Associated Protein Biomarkers from Ovariectomized Rat Urine.

Authors:  Jinkyu Lim; Sunil Hwang
Journal:  Curr Proteomics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.