Literature DB >> 19350249

Direct magnetic resonance arthrography of the knee: utility of axial traction.

N S Palhais1, D Guntern, A Kagel, M Wettstein, E Mouhsine, N Theumann.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of axial traction during acquisition of direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography examination of the knee in terms of joint space width and amount of contrast material between the cartilage surfaces. Direct knee MR arthrography was performed in 11 patients on a 3-T MR imaging unit using a T1-weighted isotropic gradient echo sequence in a coronal plane with and without axial traction of 15 kg. Joint space widths were measured at the level of the medial and the lateral femorotibial joint with and without traction. The amount of contrast material in the medial and lateral femorotibial joint was assessed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists in a semiquantitative manner using three grades ('absence of surface visualization, 'partial surface visualization or 'complete surface visualization'). With traction, joint space width increased significantly at the lateral femorotibial compartment (mean = 0.55 mm, p = 0.0105) and at the medial femorotibial compartment (mean = 0.4 mm, p = 0.0124). There was a trend towards an increased amount of contrast material in the femorotibial compartment with axial traction. Direct MR arthrography of the knee with axial traction showed a slight and significant increase of the width of the femorotibial compartment with a trend towards more contrast material between the articular cartilage surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350249     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1389-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  Superior labral anteroposterior lesions: MR arthrography with arm traction.

Authors:  K K Chan; K A Muldoon; L Yeh; R Boutin; R Pedowitz; A Skaf; D J Trudell; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography.

Authors:  Lawrence M White; Mark E Schweitzer; Dominik Weishaupt; Josef Kramer; Aileen Davis; Paul H Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  MR diagnosis of recurrent tears in the knee: value of intraarticular contrast material.

Authors:  G R Applegate; B D Flannigan; B S Tolin; J M Fox; W Del Pizzo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  MR contrast arthrography (MRA) in osteochondrosis dissecans.

Authors:  J Kramer; R Stiglbauer; A Engel; L Prayer; H Imhof
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Direct MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction: feasibility for assessing articular cartilage.

Authors:  Eva Llopis; Luis Cerezal; Ara Kassarjian; Victoria Higueras; Ernesto Fernandez
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MR arthrography of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts.

Authors:  Thomas R McCauley; Amr Elfar; Andrew Moore; Andrew H Haims; Peter Jokl; J Kevin Lynch; Patrick A Ruwe; Lee D Katz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  MR arthrography of postoperative knee: for which patients is it useful?

Authors:  Thomas Magee; Marc Shapiro; John Rodriguez; David Williams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography.

Authors:  J A Gagliardi; E M Chung; V P Chandnani; K L Kesling; K P Christensen; R N Null; M G Radvany; M F Hansen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Acetabular labral tears: contrast-enhanced MR imaging under continuous leg traction.

Authors:  T Nishii; K Nakanishi; N Sugano; H Naito; S Tamura; T Ochi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of elbow MRI with axial traction on articular cartilage visibility-a feasibility study.

Authors:  Sho Kohyama; Toshikazu Tanaka; Koshiro Shimasaki; Sayaka Kobayashi; Akira Ikumi; Takaji Yanai; Naoyuki Ochiai
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Elbow MR arthrography with traction.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; James F Griffith; Brian T Y Yuen; Alex W H Ng; David K W Yeung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of conventional MRI, MR arthrography, MR arthrography with traction, MR arthrography with pressure in the evaluation of articular distension.

Authors:  T Ormeci; B Tekin; H M Altintas; I Durur Subasi; M A Cacan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Axial Traction of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint on Articular Cartilage Visibility: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Akira Ikumi; Sho Kohyama; Shun Okuwaki; Masaki Tatsumura; Yuki Hara; Takeo Mammoto; Takeshi Ogawa; Yuichi Yoshii; Haruo Kawamura; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Effects of Axial Traction during Direct MR-Arthrography of the Wrist in Sports Injuries.

Authors:  Benjamin Dallaudière; Marie-Hélène Moreau-Durieux; Ahmed Larbi; Anne Perozziello; Pascal Huot; Philippe Meyer; Lionel Pesquer
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 1.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.