Literature DB >> 14573407

MR arthrography of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts.

Thomas R McCauley1, Amr Elfar, Andrew Moore, Andrew H Haims, Peter Jokl, J Kevin Lynch, Patrick A Ruwe, Lee D Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the accuracy of MR arthrography for identification of tears of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts and for detection of localized anterior arthrofibrosis and impingement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 27 patients (mean age, 31 years; range, 18-45 years) with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who had undergone MR arthrography followed by arthroscopy within 1 year. Three radiologists independently reviewed the MR arthrograms for the presence or absence of graft tear, localized anterior arthrofibrosis, and impingement.
RESULTS: Graft tears were identified with 100% sensitivity by all three reviewers with specificities of 100%, 89%, and 94%. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis was identified with 100% sensitivity by all reviewers, with specificities of 79%, 71%, and 38%. Impingement was detected with sensitivities and specificities of 83% and 100%, 83% and 52%, and 33% and 90% by the three reviewers, respectively. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect for detection of graft tear (kappa = 0.83, 0.92, and 0.83), was fair to moderate for detection of localized anterior arthrofibrosis (kappa = 0.50, 0.32, and 0.22), and was slight to fair for detection of impingement (kappa = 0.40, 0.08, and 0.35).
CONCLUSION: MR arthrography can accurately depict the presence of anterior cruciate ligament graft tears. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis and graft impingement were less accurately detected and showed greater observer variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14573407     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Sven Nebelung; Gregor Deitmer; Rolf Gebing; Frank Reichwein; Wolfgang Nebelung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage.

Authors:  Lawrence M White; Josef Kramer; Michael P Recht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of surgically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament graft disruption.

Authors:  Mark S Collins; Kenneth P Unruh; Jeffrey R Bond; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Direct magnetic resonance arthrography of the knee: utility of axial traction.

Authors:  N S Palhais; D Guntern; A Kagel; M Wettstein; E Mouhsine; N Theumann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Visualization of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnels: reliability of standard radiographs, CT scans, and 3D virtual reality images.

Authors:  Duncan E Meuffels; Jan-Willem Potters; Anton H J Koning; Charles H Brown; Jan A N Verhaar; Max Reijman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Grading anterior cruciate ligament graft injury after ligament reconstruction surgery: diagnostic efficacy of oblique coronal MR imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Sung Gyu Moon; Sung Hwan Hong; Ja-Young Choi; Woo Sun Jun; Jung-Ah Choi; Eun-Ah Park; Heung Sik Kang; Jong Won Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.