Literature DB >> 19345693

Generalized concentration addition: a method for examining mixtures containing partial agonists.

Gregory J Howard1, Thomas F Webster.   

Abstract

Environmentally relevant toxic exposures often consist of simultaneous exposure to multiple agents. Methods to predict the expected outcome of such combinations are critical both to risk assessment and to an accurate judgment of whether combinations are synergistic or antagonistic. Concentration addition (CA) has commonly been used to assess the presence of synergy or antagonism in combinations of similarly acting chemicals, and to predict effects of combinations of such agents. CA has the advantage of clear graphical interpretation: Curves of constant joint effect (isoboles) must be negatively sloped straight lines if the mixture is concentration additive. However, CA cannot be directly used to assess combinations that include partial agonists, although such agents are of considerable interest. Here, we propose a natural extension of CA to a functional form that may be applied to mixtures including full agonists and partial agonists. This extended definition, for which we suggest the term "generalized concentration addition," encompasses linear isoboles with slopes of any sign. We apply this approach to the simple example of agents with dose-response relationships described by Hill functions with slope parameter n=1. The resulting isoboles are in all cases linear, with negative, zero and positive slopes. Using simple mechanistic models of ligand-receptor systems, we show that the same isobole pattern and joint effects are generated by modeled combinations of full and partial agonists. Special cases include combinations of two full agonists and a full agonist plus a competitive antagonist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345693      PMCID: PMC2737481          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  19 in total

1.  Something from "nothing"--eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects.

Authors:  Elisabete Silva; Nissanka Rajapakse; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  The ligand paradox between affinity and efficacy: can you be there and not make a difference?

Authors:  Terry Kenakin; Ongun Onaran
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Isobolographic analysis for combinations of a full and partial agonist: curved isoboles.

Authors:  Yury Grabovsky; Ronald J Tallarida
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 4.  Current issues in statistics and models for ecotoxicological risk assessment.

Authors:  Nelly van der Hoeven
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.774

Review 5.  What is synergy?

Authors:  M C Berenbaum
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Operational models of pharmacological agonism.

Authors:  J W Black; P Leff
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-12-22

7.  Irritation of the upper airways from mixtures of cumene and n-propanol. Mechanisms and their consequences for setting industrial exposure limits.

Authors:  G D Nielsen; U Kristiansen; L Hansen; Y Alarie
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective.

Authors:  W R Greco; G Bravo; J C Parsons
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 9.  International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. IX. Recommendations on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology.

Authors:  D H Jenkinson; E A Barnard; D Hoyer; P P Humphrey; P Leff; N P Shankley
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.468

10.  Evaluation of toxic equivalency factors for induction of cytochromes P450 CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzyme activity by dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba; Nigel J Walker; A John Bailer; Christopher J Portier
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  20 in total

1.  Combining Chemical Permeation Enhancers for Synergistic Effects.

Authors:  Trizel du Toit; Maides M Malan; Hendrik J R Lemmer; Chrisna Gouws; Marique E Aucamp; Wilma J Breytenbach; Josias H Hamman
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Generalized Concentration Addition Model Predicts Glucocorticoid Activity Bioassay Responses to Environmentally Detected Receptor-Ligand Mixtures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Predicting the Activation of the Androgen Receptor by Mixtures of Ligands Using Generalized Concentration Addition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Schlezinger; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Generalized concentration addition for ligands that bind to homodimers.

Authors:  Thomas F Webster; Jennifer J Schlezinger
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Computational Modeling of Mixture Toxicity.

Authors:  Mainak Chatterjee; Kunal Roy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Predicting the effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance mixtures on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity in vitro.

Authors:  Greylin Nielsen; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Generalized concentration addition predicts joint effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists with partial agonists and competitive antagonists.

Authors:  Gregory J Howard; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Mark E Hahn; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Generalized Concentration Addition Modeling Predicts Mixture Effects of Environmental PPARγ Agonists.

Authors:  James Watt; Thomas F Webster; Jennifer J Schlezinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Contrasting theories of interaction in epidemiology and toxicology.

Authors:  Gregory J Howard; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.