BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by medically/surgically-resistant gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and dense squamous eosinophilia. Studies suggest that histologic assessment of esophageal eosinophilia alone cannot reliably separate patients with EoE from those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our goal was to develop an assay to identify EoE patients and perhaps differentiate EoE from other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. METHODS: A monoclonal antibody specific for an eosinophil secondary granule protein (eosinophil peroxidase [EPX]) was developed and shown to specifically identify intact eosinophils and detect eosinophil degranulation in formalin-fixed specimens. A histopathologic scoring algorithm was developed to analyze data from patient evaluations; the utility of this algorithm was assessed by using archived esophageal tissues from patients with known diagnoses of EoE and GERD as well as controls from 2 tertiary care centers. RESULTS: Intraobserver/interobserver blinded evaluations demonstrated a significant difference (P < .001) between scores of samples taken from control subjects, from patients with esophageal eosinophilia who had a diagnosis of EoE, and from patients with GERD (P < .001). This algorithm also was able to identify patients whose clinical course was suggestive of a diagnosis of EoE, but that nonetheless failed to reach the critical threshold number of > or =15 eosinophils in a high-power (40x) microscopy field. CONCLUSIONS: A novel immunohistochemical scoring system was developed to address an unmet medical need to differentiate histologic specimens from patients with EoE relative to those with GERD. The availability of a unique anti-EPX-specific monoclonal antibody, combined with the ease/rapidity of this staining method and scoring system, will provide a valuable strategy for the assessment of esophageal eosinophilia.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by medically/surgically-resistant gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and dense squamous eosinophilia. Studies suggest that histologic assessment of esophageal eosinophilia alone cannot reliably separate patients with EoE from those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our goal was to develop an assay to identify EoE patients and perhaps differentiate EoE from other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. METHODS: A monoclonal antibody specific for an eosinophil secondary granule protein (eosinophil peroxidase [EPX]) was developed and shown to specifically identify intact eosinophils and detect eosinophil degranulation in formalin-fixed specimens. A histopathologic scoring algorithm was developed to analyze data from patient evaluations; the utility of this algorithm was assessed by using archived esophageal tissues from patients with known diagnoses of EoE and GERD as well as controls from 2 tertiary care centers. RESULTS: Intraobserver/interobserver blinded evaluations demonstrated a significant difference (P < .001) between scores of samples taken from control subjects, from patients with esophageal eosinophilia who had a diagnosis of EoE, and from patients with GERD (P < .001). This algorithm also was able to identify patients whose clinical course was suggestive of a diagnosis of EoE, but that nonetheless failed to reach the critical threshold number of > or =15 eosinophils in a high-power (40x) microscopy field. CONCLUSIONS: A novel immunohistochemical scoring system was developed to address an unmet medical need to differentiate histologic specimens from patients with EoE relative to those with GERD. The availability of a unique anti-EPX-specific monoclonal antibody, combined with the ease/rapidity of this staining method and scoring system, will provide a valuable strategy for the assessment of esophageal eosinophilia.
Authors: S Sur; D G Glitz; H Kita; S M Kujawa; E A Peterson; D A Weiler; G M Kephart; J M Wagner; T J George; G J Gleich; K M Leiferman Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Elizabeth Forbes; Tosei Murase; Ming Yang; Klaus I Matthaei; James J Lee; Nancy A Lee; Paul S Foster; Simon P Hogan Journal: J Immunol Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Glenn T Furuta; Chris A Liacouras; Margaret H Collins; Sandeep K Gupta; Chris Justinich; Phil E Putnam; Peter Bonis; Eric Hassall; Alex Straumann; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Ademola Aderoju; John T Woosley; Robert S Sandler; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Amir F Kagalwalla; Noorain Akhtar; Samantha A Woodruff; Bryan A Rea; Joanne C Masterson; Vincent Mukkada; Kalyan R Parashette; Jian Du; Sophie Fillon; Cheryl A Protheroe; James J Lee; Katie Amsden; Hector Melin-Aldana; Kelley E Capocelli; Glenn T Furuta; Steven J Ackerman Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Charles W DeBrosse; Margaret H Collins; Bridget K Buckmeier Butz; Casey L Allen; Eileen C King; Amal H Assa'ad; J Pablo Abonia; Philip E Putnam; Marc E Rothenberg; James P Franciosi Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Xiaoxin Chen; C Ryan Miller; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Sergei I Ochkur; Alfred D Doyle; Elizabeth A Jacobsen; William E LeSuer; Wen Li; Cheryl A Protheroe; Katie R Zellner; Dana Colbert; HuaHao H Shen; Charlie G Irvin; James J Lee; Nancy A Lee Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Elizabeth A Kelly; Stephane Esnault; Lin Ying Liu; Michael D Evans; Mats W Johansson; Sameer Mathur; Deane F Mosher; Loren C Denlinger; Nizar N Jarjour Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405