AIM: To examine eosinophil infiltration and degranulation in 50 oesophageal biopsy specimens from 30 patients (21 men, 9 women; mean 39 years) with eosinophilic oesophagitis, by haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was carried out using a monoclonal antibody for human eosinophilic major basic protein (MBP). Eosinophils were counted in three high power fields (x40) and degranulation, as quantified by extracellular MBP immunostaining, was scored on a scale of 1-4. Morphological changes (basal cell hyperplasia, elongation of papillae and dilatation of intercellular spaces) were scored on a 1-4 scale on sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. RESULTS: Numbers of intraepithelial eosinophils were significantly higher with MBP immunostaining than with haematoxylin and eosin staining (mean 109.6 v 80.6; p<0.001), whereas numbers of eosinophils were considerably correlated (r = 0.794). Eosinophil degranulation was higher in the distal oesophagus. Additionally, basic morphological changes were markedly associated with eosinophil infiltration. Extracellular deposition of eosinophil-MBP and eosinophil infiltration in subepithelial connective tissue, present in the biopsy specimens, were detected by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: Numbers of eosinophils and degranulation are underestimated by haematoxylin and eosin staining. Immunohistochemistry detected up to two times more eosinophils than routine haematoxylin and eosin staining. Moreover, eosinophil-MBP immunoreactivity in extracellular regions indicates the release of toxic eosinophil granule proteins and gives further evidence for a causative role of eosinophils with regard to structural changes in eosinophilic oesophagitis. Immunohistochemistry may serve as a useful diagnostic tool to support the morphological differential diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
AIM: To examine eosinophil infiltration and degranulation in 50 oesophageal biopsy specimens from 30 patients (21 men, 9 women; mean 39 years) with eosinophilic oesophagitis, by haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was carried out using a monoclonal antibody for human eosinophilic major basic protein (MBP). Eosinophils were counted in three high power fields (x40) and degranulation, as quantified by extracellular MBP immunostaining, was scored on a scale of 1-4. Morphological changes (basal cell hyperplasia, elongation of papillae and dilatation of intercellular spaces) were scored on a 1-4 scale on sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. RESULTS: Numbers of intraepithelial eosinophils were significantly higher with MBP immunostaining than with haematoxylin and eosin staining (mean 109.6 v 80.6; p<0.001), whereas numbers of eosinophils were considerably correlated (r = 0.794). Eosinophil degranulation was higher in the distal oesophagus. Additionally, basic morphological changes were markedly associated with eosinophil infiltration. Extracellular deposition of eosinophil-MBP and eosinophil infiltration in subepithelial connective tissue, present in the biopsy specimens, were detected by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: Numbers of eosinophils and degranulation are underestimated by haematoxylin and eosin staining. Immunohistochemistry detected up to two times more eosinophils than routine haematoxylin and eosin staining. Moreover, eosinophil-MBP immunoreactivity in extracellular regions indicates the release of toxic eosinophil granule proteins and gives further evidence for a causative role of eosinophils with regard to structural changes in eosinophilic oesophagitis. Immunohistochemistry may serve as a useful diagnostic tool to support the morphological differential diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Authors: A M Levy; K Yamazaki; V P Van Keulen; L J Burgart; W J Sandborn; S F Phillips; G M Kephart; G J Gleich; K M Leiferman Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: J S Erjefält; L Greiff; M Andersson; E Matsson; H Petersen; M Linden; T Ansari; P K Jeffery; C G Persson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: John Croese; Stephen K Fairley; John W Masson; André K H Chong; David A Whitaker; Peter A Kanowski; Neal I Walker Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Xiaoxin Chen; C Ryan Miller; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Su Hwan Kim; Ji Bong Jeong; Ji Won Kim; Seong-Joon Koh; Byeong Gwan Kim; Kook Lae Lee; Mee Soo Chang; Jong Pil Im; Hyoun Woo Kang; Cheol Min Shin Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Shikha Mangla; Alison H Goldin; Gaurav Singal; Jason L Hornick; Karen S Hsu Blatman; Robert Burakoff; Walter W Chan Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Rossana C N Melo; Lisa A Spencer; Sandra A C Perez; Josiane S Neves; Staci P Bafford; Ellen S Morgan; Ann M Dvorak; Peter F Weller Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2009-04-27 Impact factor: 5.662