Literature DB >> 19343460

Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures.

Cale A Jacobs1, Christian P Christensen.   

Abstract

Subjective evaluations often are used after knee arthroplasty to quantify function; however, these scores may be influenced by pain and/or function of the nonoperated limb. Multiple influences increase variability of these scores, which in turn may result in a greater change in score required to be considered clinically important. We determined the relationships among the Knee Society pain and function scores, range of motion (ROM), and functional force measures of the surgically treated and nonoperated limbs. Before and 3 months after total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, 36 patients answered questions necessary to calculate the Knee Society pain and function scores. A dual-force platform was used to record the lift-up force of each limb during a stepping task. Function scores were correlated to pain scores, lift-up force of the nonoperated limb, and ROM before surgery. After surgery, function scores correlated with pain scores but not with objective functional measures or ROM. As patient-reported function scores and functional force measures of the surgically treated limb seem to provide distinctly different information, both measures may need to be collected after knee arthroplasty to fully understand a patient's functional recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19343460      PMCID: PMC2866940          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0811-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Y C Lin; R C Davey; T Cochrane
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Functional assessment using the step-up-and-over test and forward lunge following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Carl G Mattacola; Carl A Jacobs; Mark A Rund; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III.

Authors:  N Bellamy; J Kirwan; M Boers; P Brooks; V Strand; P Tugwell; R Altman; K Brandt; M Dougados; M Lequesne
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 5.  Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches.

Authors:  D T Felson; R C Lawrence; M C Hochberg; T McAlindon; P A Dieppe; M A Minor; S N Blair; B M Berman; J F Fries; M Weinberger; K R Lorig; J J Jacobs; V Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects.

Authors:  M Walsh; L J Woodhouse; S G Thomas; E Finch
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-03

7.  The reliability, validity and responsiveness of an aggregated locomotor function (ALF) score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  C J McCarthy; J A Oldham
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Allyson Jones; Donald C Voaklander; Maria E Suarez-Alma
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-08

9.  Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores.

Authors:  M A Ritter; A E Thong; K E Davis; M E Berend; J B Meding; P M Faris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

10.  Physical activity and its relationship to physical performance in patients with end stage knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Scott G Thomas; Sonia M C Pagura; Deborah Kennedy
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  18 in total

1.  Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Santiago Gonzalez-Parreño; Daniel Martinez-Mendez; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wu Chean Lee; Yu Heng Kwan; Hwei Chi Chong; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity.

Authors:  T P Branch; R Siebold; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham Seow-Hng Goh; Merng Koon Wong; Pak Lin Chin; Darren Keng-Jin Tay; Seng-Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan L Mizner; Stephanie C Petterson; Katie E Clements; Joseph A Zeni; James J Irrgang; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Patient-oriented and performance-based outcomes after knee autologous chondrocyte implantation: a timeline for the first year of recovery.

Authors:  Jennifer S Howard; Carl G Mattacola; David R Mullineaux; Robert A English; Christian Lattermann
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  Performance-Based Versus Self-Reported Outcomes Using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael R Dayton; Dana L Judd; Craig A Hogan; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Survival, functional outcome and satisfaction of first revision total knee arthroplasty at a mean eleven-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Hecker; Hans-Jürg A Pütz; Sebastian Wangler; Frank M Klenke
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Clinical Outcomes and Global Health After Joint Debridement in Adult-Onset Septic Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Ranjith Malipeddi; Sandeep Kumar Nema; B Gopisankar; M Prabu; P Pasupathy; B Suresh Gandhi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Michelle M Dowsey; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.