Literature DB >> 19342477

Breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks in chromosomes have different evolutionary histories.

Denis M Larkin1, Greg Pape, Ravikiran Donthu, Loretta Auvil, Michael Welge, Harris A Lewin.   

Abstract

The persistence of large blocks of homologous synteny and a high frequency of breakpoint reuse are distinctive features of mammalian chromosomes that are not well understood in evolutionary terms. To gain a better understanding of the evolutionary forces that affect genome architecture, synteny relationships among 10 amniotes (human, chimp, macaque, rat, mouse, pig, cattle, dog, opossum, and chicken) were compared at <1 human-Mbp resolution. Homologous synteny blocks (HSBs; N = 2233) and chromosome evolutionary breakpoint regions (EBRs; N = 1064) were identified from pairwise comparisons of all genomes. Analysis of the size distribution of HSBs shared in all 10 species' chromosomes (msHSBs) identified three (>20 Mbp) that are larger than expected by chance. Gene network analysis of msHSBs >3 human-Mbp and EBRs <1 Mbp demonstrated that msHSBs are significantly enriched for genes involved in development of the central nervous and other organ systems, whereas EBRs are enriched for genes associated with adaptive functions. In addition, we found EBRs are significantly enriched for structural variations (segmental duplications, copy number variants, and indels), retrotransposed and zinc finger genes, and single nucleotide polymorphisms. These results demonstrate that chromosome breakage in evolution is nonrandom and that HSBs and EBRs are evolving in distinctly different ways. We suggest that natural selection acts on the genome to maintain combinations of genes and their regulatory elements that are essential to fundamental processes of amniote development and biological organization. Furthermore, EBRs may be used extensively to generate new genetic variation and novel combinations of genes and regulatory elements that contribute to adaptive phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19342477      PMCID: PMC2675965          DOI: 10.1101/gr.086546.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  39 in total

1.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.

Authors:  M A Noor; K L Grams; L A Bertucci; J Reiland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human chromosome 19 and related regions in mouse: conservative and lineage-specific evolution.

Authors:  P Dehal; P Predki; A S Olsen; A Kobayashi; P Folta; S Lucas; M Land; A Terry; C L Ecale Zhou; S Rash; Q Zhang; L Gordon; J Kim; C Elkin; M J Pollard; P Richardson; D Rokhsar; E Uberbacher; T Hawkins; E Branscomb; L Stubbs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?

Authors:  E Skovlund; G U Fenstad
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents.

Authors:  S Ono
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; B A Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Maitreya J Dunham; Hassan Badrane; Tracy Ferea; Julian Adams; Patrick O Brown; Frank Rosenzweig; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains.

Authors:  José E Pérez-Ortín; Amparo Querol; Sergi Puig; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence--accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes.

Authors:  Arcadi Navarro; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mouse segmental duplication and copy number variation.

Authors:  Xinwei She; Ze Cheng; Sebastian Zöllner; Deanna M Church; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bailey; Robert Baertsch; W James Kent; David Haussler; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  82 in total

1.  Ancestral grass karyotype reconstruction unravels new mechanisms of genome shuffling as a source of plant evolution.

Authors:  Florent Murat; Jian-Hong Xu; Eric Tannier; Michael Abrouk; Nicolas Guilhot; Caroline Pont; Joachim Messing; Jérôme Salse
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Reconstruction and evolutionary history of eutherian chromosomes.

Authors:  Jaebum Kim; Marta Farré; Loretta Auvil; Boris Capitanu; Denis M Larkin; Jian Ma; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Every genome sequence needs a good map.

Authors:  Harris A Lewin; Denis M Larkin; Joan Pontius; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  The Genome 10K Project: a way forward.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Benedict Paten; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Annu Rev Anim Biosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 8.923

5.  Advances in computer simulation of genome evolution: toward more realistic evolutionary genomics analysis by approximate bayesian computation.

Authors:  Miguel Arenas
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Genomic disorders: a window into human gene and genome evolution.

Authors:  Claudia M B Carvalho; Feng Zhang; James R Lupski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular cytogenetics of the california condor: evolutionary and conservation implications.

Authors:  W S Modi; M Romanov; E D Green; O Ryder
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  CYNTENATOR: progressive gene order alignment of 17 vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Christian Rödelsperger; Christoph Dieterich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genome landscape and evolutionary plasticity of chromosomes in malaria mosquitoes.

Authors:  Ai Xia; Maria V Sharakhova; Scotland C Leman; Zhijian Tu; Jeffrey A Bailey; Christopher D Smith; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolution of a bitter taste receptor gene cluster in a New World sparrow.

Authors:  Jamie K Davis; Josh J Lowman; Pamela J Thomas; Boudewijn F H ten Hallers; Maxim Koriabine; Lynn Y Huynh; Donna L Maney; Pieter J de Jong; Christa L Martin; James W Thomas
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.