Literature DB >> 19341877

Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms.

Rabih A Chaer1, Anna Gushchin, Robert Rhee, Luke Marone, Jae S Cho, Steven Leers, Michel S Makaroun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Long-term surveillance with computed tomography (CT) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) increases both cost and risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of an alternative follow-up modality with color flow duplex ultrasound scanning (CDU) as the sole method of imaging.
METHODS: In 2003, we initiated a new follow-up (FU) schedule with yearly CDU as the sole imaging method for selected patients. Indications included a residual sac of less than 4 cm, expanded later to stable sac size for more than 2 years. A stable type II endoleak was not a contraindication. CT scans were obtained selectively-based on suspicious findings of a new endoleak or enlarging sac on CDU. The records of all patients with at least 1 year FU under this schedule were reviewed.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients were followed with CDU only for 1 to 4 years for a mean of 24 +/- 13 months. The new schedule was initiated at a mean of 34 +/- 24 months after EVAR (range 1-112 months). Twenty-three patients had previous endoleaks that had resolved spontaneously or had been treated. During CDU FU, three new endoleaks were detected, one with sac enlargement. All prompted CT evaluation: one type II endoleak with stable sac size could not be identified on CT 3 months later, and two distal type I endoleaks that required limb extension. All three had a prior Ancure endograft. No ruptures or graft occlusions were noted. One abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) related death followed graft explantation for infection. There were two additional deaths from malignancy and two from cardiac causes. After the FU switch, freedom from endoleaks was 96%, and from secondary interventions 95% at 48 months by life table method. Mean AAA diameter at baseline was 54 +/- 8 mm and decreased to 40 +/- 11 mm before the switch to CDU only FU. At last FU mean aneurysm diameter was 39 +/- 11 mm. When the current switch criteria were applied to a consecutive series of 200 EVAR patients, 97% would have been eligible for CDU only surveillance by 3 years postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: CDU only surveillance post-EVAR is safe and can be initiated early after treatment in patients with shrinking or stable aneurysms. This policy should result in cost savings advantage and avoid the complications associated with CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341877     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

1.  "Sweet spot" for endoleak detection: optimizing contrast to noise using low keV reconstructions from fast-switch kVp dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Katherine E Maturen; Ravi K Kaza; Peter S Liu; Leslie E Quint; Shokoufeh H Khalatbari; Joel F Platt
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

Authors:  Evridiki Karanikola; Ilias Dalainas; Georgios Karaolanis; Georgios Zografos; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-09

3.  Role of multidetector CT angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in redefining follow-up protocols after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  R Motta; L Rubaltelli; R Vezzaro; V Vida; P Marchesi; R Stramare; A Zanon; M Battistel; M Sommavilla; D Miotto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Imaging of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: the present and the future.

Authors:  Hao Hong; Yunan Yang; Bo Liu; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Curr Vasc Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.719

Review 5.  Surgical Versus Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evidence to Guide the Optimal Approach for the Individual Patient.

Authors:  Theodore Hart; Ross Milner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Longer follow-up intervals following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair are safe and appropriate after marked aneurysm sac regression.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Andraska; Amanda R Phillips; Katherine M Reitz; Sina Asaadi; Yancheng Dai; Edith Tzeng; Michel Makaroun; Nathan Liang
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 7.  [Abdominal aortic aneurysm].

Authors:  N Diehm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 8.  Contemporary Applications of Ultrasound in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Management.

Authors:  Mark Scaife; Triantafillos Giannakopoulos; Georges E Al-Khoury; Rabih A Chaer; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-05-27

9.  Duplex ultrasound and computed tomography angiography in the follow-up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparative study.

Authors:  Alex Aparecido Cantador; Daniel Emílio Dalledone Siqueira; Octavio Barcellos Jacobsen; Jamal Baracat; Ines Minniti Rodrigues Pereira; Fábio Hüsemann Menezes; Ana Terezinha Guillaumon
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

10.  Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Endoleaks with Failed Computed Tomography Angiography Diagnosis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Yue-Xin Chen; Bo Zhang; Yu-Xin Jiang; Chang-Wei Liu; Rui-Na Zhao; Qiong Wu; Da-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.