Literature DB >> 19340606

Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF in community-dwelling older people in Taiwan using Rasch analysis.

Wen-Miin Liang1, Chih-Hung Chang, Yi-Chun Yeh, Haw-Yaw Shy, Hung-Wei Chen, Mau-Roung Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric characteristics of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire in rural-community-dwelling older people in Taiwan using Rasch analysis.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 1200 subjects aged >or=65 years were recruited to complete the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF. Scale dimensionality, item difficulty, scale reliability and separation, item targeting, item-person map, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined.
RESULTS: The four WHOQOL-BREF scales (physical capacity, psychological well-being, social relationships, and environment) were found to be unidimensional and reliable. The item-person map for each domain indicated that the spread of the item thresholds sufficiently covered the latent trait continuum being measured. However, gaps in content coverage were identified in the social domain. Analyses of the DIF revealed that one psychological item (body image) exhibited DIF across the two age groups (old-old vs. young-old) and that two social items (sexual activity and friends' support) displayed DIF across genders and the two age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Rasch analysis is a comprehensive method of psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF and identifies areas for improvements. Three items displaying age-related DIF (body image, sexual activity, and friends' support) may potentially cause biased health-related QOL assessments, and their impacts on scores should be carefully examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340606     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9471-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  39 in total

1.  A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment.

Authors:  D Cella; C H Chang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  International conference on objective measurement: applications of Rasch analysis in health care.

Authors:  Kendon J Conrad; Everett V Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Validating, improving reliability, and estimating correlation of the four subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF using multidimensional Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Chung Wang; Grace Yao; Yih-Jian Tsai; Jung-Der Wang; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Difference between generic and multiple sclerosis-specific quality of life instruments regarding the assessment of treatment efficacy.

Authors:  S Ozakbas; B B Akdede; G Kösehasanogullari; O Aksan; E Idiman
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  A new questionnaire specifically designed for patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; The Italian Health Status Questionnaire.

Authors:  G Vidotto; G Bertolotti; M Carone; F Arpinelli; V Bellia; P W Jones; C F Donner
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 3.415

7.  Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire reduced form: a method for improving the questionnaire using the Rasch model.

Authors:  G Vidotto; M Carone; P W Jones; S Salini; G Bertolotti
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: A comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.

Authors:  Oliver H Günther; Christiane Roick; Matthias C Angermeyer; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Validation of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection.

Authors:  C T Fang; P C Hsiung; C F Yu; M Y Chen; J D Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.440

View more
  12 in total

1.  Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for general use in New Zealand: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Paula Kersten; D Rex Billington; Patricia Hsien-Chuan Hsu; Daniel Shepherd; Jason Landon; Xuan Joanna Feng
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effects of Depression, Anxiety, Stigma, and Disclosure on Health-Related Quality of Life among Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in Dalian, China.

Authors:  Ge Li; Gongchen Wang; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jianzhao Xu; Xia Pei; Bo Zhao; Avinash Shetty
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version: a validation study in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Laia Mas-Expósito; Juan Antonio Amador-Campos; Juana Gómez-Benito; Lluís Lalucat-Jo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Health-related quality of life in southern Iranian rural women: a multivariate multilevel study.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Najaf Zare; Tania Dehesh
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-10

5.  Developing a Shortened Quality of Life Scale from Persian Version of the WHOQOL-100 Using the Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Kamran Yazdani; Saharnaz Nedjat; Masoud Karimlou; Hojjat Zeraati; Kazem Mohammad; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: further item validation.

Authors:  Kun-Chia Chang; Jung-Der Wang; Hsin-Pei Tang; Ching-Ming Cheng; Chung-Ying Lin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong and Xuesaitong capsules for treating stroke: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Huiling Chen; Hongbo Cao; Xu Guo; Meidan Zhao; Qing Xia; Bo Chen; Tieniu Zhao; Wenyuan Gao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic headache. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF.

Authors:  Patrick Brzoska
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population.

Authors:  Mary H Kalfoss; Randi J Reidunsdatter; Christian A Klöckner; Marianne Nilsen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 for HRQOL assessment in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Yu-Jun Chang; Wen-Miin Liang; Hsi-Chin Wu; Hsueh-Chun Lin; Jong-Yi Wang; Tsai-Chung Li; Yi-Chun Yeh; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.