Literature DB >> 12544962

Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire.

Andrew M Garratt1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey using patient questionnaires was conducted. OBJECTIVE To assess whether the Roland Disability Questionnaire satisfies the Rasch model including unidimensionality and item separation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Roland Disability Questionnaire, the most widely used patient-assessed measure of health outcome for back pain, has undergone several evaluations for its measurement properties including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. However, there is no published work relating to the underlying dimensionality of the instrument and the extent to which individual items contribute to the construct of physical disability resulting from low back pain.
METHODS: Patients entering a randomized controlled trial of exercise, manipulation, and usual management for back pain completed a questionnaire that included the Roland Disability Questionnaire. The Winsteps program was used to assess whether the Roland Disability Questionnaire fits the Rasch model. Item fit was assessed using the Infit and Outfit statistics.
RESULTS: The Roland Disability Questionnaire was completed by 1008 (90%) of the patients taking part in the trial. Most of the items in the Roland Disability Questionnaire contribute to a single underlying construct. However, four items had poor Outfit statistics, suggesting that they do not contribute sufficiently to the scale hierarchy. Several items positioned around the middle of the hierarchy are not sufficiently distinct in terms of difficulty. There were very few items positioned at the extremes of the hierarchy.
CONCLUSIONS: The Roland Disability Questionnaire largely satisfies the Rasch model for unidimensionality. However, the instrument could be improved through the removal of poorly fitting items and the addition of items at the upper and lower points of the scale hierarchy. The distribution of Roland Disability Questionnaire scores should be carefully considered before statistical testing is undertaken. Rasch transformed scores can be used to deal with deficiencies in the scale hierarchy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544962     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Validation of the problem gambling severity index using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch modelling.

Authors:  Natalie V Miller; Shawn R Currie; David C Hodgins; David Casey
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: one or more dimensions?

Authors:  Tiê Parma Yamato; Chris G Maher; Bruno T Saragiotto; Mark J Catley; James H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Rasch analysis of 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Megan Davidson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Self-reported assessment of disability and performance-based assessment of disability are influenced by different patient characteristics in acute low back pain.

Authors:  Benedict Martin Wand; Lara A Chiffelle; Neil Edward O'Connell; James Henry McAuley; Lorraine Hilary Desouza
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF in community-dwelling older people in Taiwan using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Miin Liang; Chih-Hung Chang; Yi-Chun Yeh; Haw-Yaw Shy; Hung-Wei Chen; Mau-Roung Lin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Rating catatonia in patients with chronic schizophrenia: Rasch analysis of the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale.

Authors:  Eric Wong; Gabor S Ungvari; Siu-Kau Leung; Wai-Kwong Tang
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  Design considerations in a clinical trial of a cognitive behavioural intervention for the management of low back pain in primary care: Back Skills Training Trial.

Authors:  Sarah E Lamb; Ranjit Lall; Zara Hansen; Emma J Withers; Frances E Griffiths; Ala Szczepura; Julie Barlow; Martin R Underwood
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.