Literature DB >> 19333967

Case-control association testing in the presence of unknown relationships.

Yoonha Choi1, Ellen M Wijsman, Bruce S Weir.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies result in inflated false-positive results when unrecognized cryptic relatedness exists. A number of methods have been proposed for testing association between markers and disease with a correction for known pedigree-based relationships. However, in most case-control studies, relationships are generally unknown, yet the design is predicated on the assumption of at least ancestral relatedness among cases. Here, we focus on adjusting cryptic relatedness when the genealogy of the sample is unknown, particularly in the context of samples from isolated populations where cryptic relatedness may be problematic. We estimate cryptic relatedness using maximum-likelihood methods and use a corrected chi(2) test with estimated kinship coefficients for testing in the context of unknown cryptic relatedness. Estimated kinship coefficients characterize precisely the relatedness between truly related people, but are biased for unrelated pairs. The proposed test substantially reduces spurious positive results, producing a uniform null distribution of P-values. Especially with missing pedigree information, estimated kinship coefficients can still be used to correct non-independence among individuals. The corrected test was applied to real data sets from genetic isolates and created a distribution of P-value that was close to uniform. Thus, the proposed test corrects the non-uniform distribution of P-values obtained with the uncorrected test and illustrates the advantage of the approach on real data. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19333967      PMCID: PMC2790016          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  39 in total

Review 1.  Association study designs for complex diseases.

Authors:  L R Cardon; J I Bell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Use of population isolates for mapping complex traits.

Authors:  L Peltonen; A Palotie; K Lange
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.

Authors:  M S McPeek; L Sun
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The power of genomic control.

Authors:  S A Bacanu; B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Positional cloning of disease genes: advantages of genetic isolates.

Authors:  L Peltonen
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Implementing a unified approach to family-based tests of association.

Authors:  N M Laird; S Horvath; X Xu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  The value of isolated populations.

Authors:  S Shifman; A Darvasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects.

Authors:  S L Slager; D J Schaid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Chasing genes for mood disorders and schizophrenia in genetically isolated populations.

Authors:  Tine Venken; Jurgen Del-Favero
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  50 in total

1.  Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Ani Manichaikul; Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Stephen S Rich; Kathy Daly; Michèle Sale; Wei-Min Chen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Inferring coancestry in population samples in the presence of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  M D Brown; C G Glazner; C Zheng; E A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Family-based association studies for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yun Zhu; Momiao Xiong
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Estimating kinship in admixed populations.

Authors:  Timothy Thornton; Hua Tang; Thomas J Hoffmann; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Bette J Caan; Neil Risch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Statistical genetic issues for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.166

6.  PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers.

Authors:  Alejandro Q Nato; Nicola H Chapman; Harkirat K Sohi; Hiep D Nguyen; Zoran Brkanac; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Model-free Estimation of Recent Genetic Relatedness.

Authors:  Matthew P Conomos; Alexander P Reiner; Bruce S Weir; Timothy A Thornton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Characterizing allelic association in the genome era.

Authors:  B S Weir; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 9.  Identity by descent: variation in meiosis, across genomes, and in populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  REFINING GENETICALLY INFERRED RELATIONSHIPS USING TREELET COVARIANCE SMOOTHING.

Authors:  Andrew Crossett; Ann B Lee; Lambertus Klei; Bernie Devlin; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.