Literature DB >> 19332680

Fitness cost of VanA-type vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Marie-Laure Foucault1, Patrice Courvalin, Catherine Grillot-Courvalin.   

Abstract

We have quantified the biological cost of VanA-type glycopeptide resistance due to the acquisition of the resistance operon by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Enterococcus sp. Exponential growths of recipient strain HIP11713, its transconjugant VRSA-1, VRSA-5, and VRSA-6 were compared in the absence or, except for HIP11713, in the presence of vancomycin. Induction of resistance was performed by adding vancomycin in both the preculture and the culture or the culture at only 1/50 the MIC. In the absence of vancomycin, the growth rates of the vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) strains were similar to that of susceptible MRSA strain HIP11713. When resistance was induced, and under both conditions, there was a significant reduction of the growth rate of the VRSA strains relative to that of HIP11713 and to those of their noninduced counterparts, corresponding to a ca. 20% to 38% reduction in fitness. Competition experiments between isogenic VRSA-1 and HIP11713 mixed at a 1:1, 1:100, or 100:1 ratio revealed a competitive disadvantage of 0.4% to 3% per 10 generations of the transconjugant versus the recipient. This slight fitness burden can be attributed to the basal level of expression of the van genes in the absence of induction combined with a gene dosage effect due to the presence of the van operon on multicopy plasmids. These data indicate that VanA-type resistance, when induced, is highly costly for the MRSA host, whereas in the absence of induction, its biological cost is minimal. Thus, the potential for the dissemination of VRSA clinical isolates should not be underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19332680      PMCID: PMC2687198          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01702-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  23 in total

Review 1.  The biological cost of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  D I Andersson; B R Levin
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 2.  Modes and modulations of antibiotic resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Florence Depardieu; Isabelle Podglajen; Roland Leclercq; Ekkehard Collatz; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: gene dosage effect, stability, fitness costs, and cross-resistances.

Authors:  Silke Besier; Albrecht Ludwig; Johannes Zander; Volker Brade; Thomas A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The VanS-VanR two-component regulatory system controls synthesis of depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147.

Authors:  M Arthur; C Molinas; P Courvalin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Synergism between beta-lactams and glycopeptides against VanA-type methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterologous expression of the vanA operon.

Authors:  Bruno Périchon; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Spontaneous deletion of the methicillin resistance determinant, mecA, partially compensates for the fitness cost associated with high-level vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Michael J Noto; Paige M Fox; Gordon L Archer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Plasmid content of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis isolate from a patient also colonized by Staphylococcus aureus with a VanA phenotype.

Authors:  Susan E Flannagan; Joseph W Chow; Susan M Donabedian; William J Brown; Mary B Perri; Marcus J Zervos; Yoshiyuki Ozawa; Don B Clewell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Characterization of Tn1546, a Tn3-related transposon conferring glycopeptide resistance by synthesis of depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147.

Authors:  M Arthur; C Molinas; F Depardieu; P Courvalin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Longzhu Cui; Xiaoxue Ma; Katsuhiro Sato; Keiko Okuma; Fred C Tenover; Elsa M Mamizuka; Curtis G Gemmell; Mi-Na Kim; Marie-Cecile Ploy; N El-Solh; Vivian Ferraz; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with Inc18-like vanA plasmids in Michigan.

Authors:  Wenming Zhu; Nancye C Clark; Linda K McDougal; Jeffery Hageman; L Clifford McDonald; Jean B Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  49 in total

1.  Safety and immunogenicity of a novel Staphylococcus aureus vaccine: results from the first study of the vaccine dose range in humans.

Authors:  Clayton Harro; Robert Betts; Walter Orenstein; Eun-Jeong Kwak; Howard E Greenberg; Matthew T Onorato; Jon Hartzel; Joy Lipka; Mark J DiNubile; Nicholas Kartsonis
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-10-13

Review 2.  Multidrug evolutionary strategies to reverse antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Michael Baym; Laura K Stone; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mode of action of Van-M-02, a novel glycopeptide inhibitor of peptidoglycan synthesis, in vancomycin-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Kenji Miura; Hidenori Yamashiro; Kouichi Uotani; Satoshi Kojima; Takashi Yutsudo; Jun Lu; Osamu Yoshida; Yoshinori Yamano; Hideki Maki; Hirokazu Arimoto
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance?

Authors:  Dan I Andersson; Diarmaid Hughes
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 5.  Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: a successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world?

Authors:  Alejandro Beceiro; María Tomás; Germán Bou
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Impact of Time to Appropriate Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Infection.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; C A Burnham; David K Warren; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Varying fitness cost associated with resistance to fluoroquinolones governs clonal dynamic of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A Horváth; O Dobay; S Kardos; Á Ghidán; Á Tóth; J Pászti; E Ungvári; P Horváth; K Nagy; S Zissman; M Füzi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Effects of biofilm growth on plasmid copy number and expression of antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  L C Cook; G M Dunny
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Haemophilus influenzae clinical isolates with plasmid pB1000 bearing blaROB-1: fitness cost and interspecies dissemination.

Authors:  Alvaro San Millan; Silvia Garcia-Cobos; Jose Antonio Escudero; Laura Hidalgo; Belen Gutierrez; Laura Carrilero; Jose Campos; Bruno Gonzalez-Zorn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Compensation of the metabolic costs of antibiotic resistance by physiological adaptation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nadine Händel; J Merijn Schuurmans; Stanley Brul; Benno H ter Kuile
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.