| Literature DB >> 19332457 |
Hirozo Goto1, Nobuhiko Satoh, Yoshinori Hayashi, Hiroaki Hikiami, Yutaka Nagata, Ryosuke Obi, Yutaka Shimada.
Abstract
In post-stroke patients, the recurrence of stroke and progression of impairments lead to a bedridden state and dementia. As for their treatments, only anti-hypertension and anti-coagulation therapies to prevent the recurrence of stroke are available. In Asia, post-stroke patients with impairments are often treated with herbal medicine. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of tokishakuyakusan (TS) in improving the impairment and independence in post-stroke patients. Thirty-one post-stroke patients (mean age = 81.4 years) were recruited and enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to the TS group (n = 16) or non-treatment (control) group (n = 15) and treated for 12 months. Impairments were assessed using the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). Independence was evaluated using the functional independence measure (FIM). For each outcome measure, mean change was calculated every 3 months. The results were that impairments according to SIAS did not significantly change in the TS group. In contrast, SIAS significantly worsened in the control group. There was a significant difference between the two groups. In each term of SIAS, affected lower extremity scores, abdominal muscle strength, function of visuospatial perception, and so forth. in the TS group were better than those in the control group. Independence according to FIM did not change significantly in the TS group. In contrast, FIM significantly worsened in the control group. There was also a significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, TS was considered to suppress the impairments of lower limbs and to exert a favorable effect on cerebral function for post-stroke patients.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 19332457 PMCID: PMC3095247 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Clinical and demographic characteristics of study participants.
| Group | TS group | Control group |
|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 4/12 | 5/10 |
| Age, mean ± SD | 81.0 ± 9.4 | 81.9 ± 7.1 |
| Duration of illness, months, mean ± SD | 77.3 ± 86.9 | 58.6 ± 62.2 |
| Disease | ||
| Cerebral infarction | 11 | 12 |
| Cerebral bleeding | 4 | 3 |
| Subarachnoidal hemorrhage | 1 | 0 |
| Complication | ||
| Hypertension | 11 | 9 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 4 | 5 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 1 | 3 |
| Anti-coagulant drugs | 5 | 7 |
Note: All group comparisons P > .05. SD: standard deviation; TS: Tokishakuyakusan.
Changes in SIAS, FIM and body weight of TS and control groups.
| Outcome | Range | Group | Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 9 months | 12 months |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIAS | 0–76 | TS | 43.6 ± 20.6 | 45.0 ± 21.5 | 43.6 ± 20.6 | 43.6 ± 20.7 | 43.4 ± 20.5 | .044 |
| Control | 43.6 ± 15.9 | 43.3 ± 15.6 | 41.9 ± 14.9 | 41.2 ± 14.7 | 36.9 ± 16.6* | |||
| FIM | 0–126 | TS | 66.1 ± 29.3 | 65.5 ± 31.0 | 66.3 ± 30.6 | 65.4 ± 31.3 | 66.2 ± 31.5 | .008 |
| Control | 60.8 ± 21.4 | 58.3 ± 21.4 | 56.7 ± 20.9 | 55.8 ± 20.8 | 49.2 ± 20.7* | |||
| Body weight | (kg) | TS | 41.6 ± 7.1 | 41.7 ± 7.8 | 41.8 ± 7.4 | 40.5 ± 7.3 | 40.1 ± 7.4* | .64 |
| Control | 44.6 ± 7.8 | 44.3 ± 7.9 | 43.9 ± 7.6 | 42.6 ± 7.7 | 41.9 ± 7.4** |
aComparison of 12-month changes between TS group and control group.
*P < .05, **P < .01, comparison from baseline to 12 months in the same group.
Comparison between TS and control groups on each item of SIAS.
| Variable | Range | TS group | Control group |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 12 months | Baseline | 12 months | |||
| Knee-mouse | 0–5 | 2.53 ± 1.92 | 2.40 ± 0.51 | 2.13 ± 1.77 | 1.73 ± 1.75* | .295 |
| Finger-function | 0–5 | 2.33 ± 1.76 | 2.27 ± 1.87 | 1.87 ± 1.55 | 1.40 ± 1.35* | .197 |
| Hip-function | 0–5 | 2.40 ± 1.50 | 2.27 ± 1.58 | 2.33 ± 1.40 | 1.80 ± 1.37** | .262 |
| Knee-extension | 0–5 | 2.27 ± 1.44 | 2.27 ± 1.39 | 2.13 ± 1.46 | 1.40 ± 1.12** | <.001 |
| Foot-pat | 0–5 | 2.33 ± 1.45 | 2.27 ± 1.39 | 2.27 ± 1.67 | 1.73 ± 1.44** | .018 |
| DTR | 0–3 | 1.83 ± 0.98 | 1.90 ± 0.87 | 2.10 ± 0.81 | 2.00 ± 0.78 | .106 |
| Tone | 0–3 | 2.10 ± 1.04 | 1.83 ± 1.10 | 2.10 ± 0.81 | 2.00 ± 0.80 | .670 |
| Touch | 0–3 | 2.30 ± 0.75 | 2.13 ± 0.74 | 2.17 ± 0.77 | 1.83 ± 0.92 | .237 |
| Position | 0–3 | 1.87 ± 1.06 | 1.87 ± 1.13 | 1.97 ± 0.90 | 1.77 ± 0.98 | .219 |
| Range of motion | 0–3 | 1.87 ± 1.06 | 1.87 ± 1.13 | 1.97 ± 0.90 | 1.76 ± 0.98 | .219 |
| Pain | 0–3 | 2.53 ± 0.64 | 2.47 ± 0.64 | 2.73 ± 0.46 | 2.73 ± 0.46 | .560 |
| Abdominal MMT | 0–3 | 1.40 ± 1.06 | 1.67 ± 1.18* | 1.33 ± 0.82 | 1.20 ± 0.86 | .004 |
| Verticality | 0–3 | 2.27 ± 0.80 | 2.13 ± 0.99 | 2.07 ± 0.59 | 1.73 ± 0.88* | .359 |
| Visuo-spat. score | 0–3 | 1.67 ± 1.35 | 1.80 ± 1.42 | 1.67 ± 0.98 | 1.33 ± 1.18* | .031 |
| Speech | 0–3 | 2.00 ± 0.93 | 1.87 ± 0.92 | 1.73 ± 0.70 | 1.40 ± 0.74 | .681 |
| Unaffected quadriceps | 0–3 | 1.80 ± 0.78 | 1.87 ± 0.74 | 1.93 ± 0.70 | 1.53 ± 0.83* | .022 |
| Unaffected grip power (kg) | 8.93 ± 6.20 | 8.07 ± 6.31 | 10.7 ± 7.16 | 8.80 ± 7.67 | .671 | |
DTR, deep tender reflexes; MMT, manual muscle testing; Visuo-spat., visuospatial perception.
aComparison of 12-month changes between TS group and control group.
*P < .05, **P < .01, Comparison between baseline and at 12 months in the same group.
Figure 1Hypothetical representation of the effects of TS on post-stroke patents. LH-RH: luteum hormone releasing hormone; PRL: prolactin; Ach-R: acetylcholine receptor; ChAT: choline acetyltransferase; NGF: nerve growth factor.