Literature DB >> 1933220

Psychosocial and sexual impact of diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

L J Fallowfield1, A Hall.   

Abstract

Psychosocial and sexual disturbances are common sequelae to a diagnosis of breast cancer and its treatment. The intuitively plausible hope that the advent of breast conserving techniques would prevent the psychological distress experienced following mastectomy has not been realised. Studies comparing psychosocial outcome of mastectomy with lumpectomy and radiotherapy reveal some advantage to women treated with breast conserving procedures in terms of body image, but very little difference in terms of psychiatric morbidity or sexual dysfunction. Whatever the primary therapy, women must still confront the fact that they have had cancer, a life-threatening disease which may recur. In this chapter the research comparing psychological outcome between mastectomy and lumpectomy is critically reviewed and the implications that these data have for clinical practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1933220     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med Bull        ISSN: 0007-1420            Impact factor:   4.291


  12 in total

1.  When is "Cure" Not Enough?: Helping a Breast Cancer Patient to Overcome Fear and Regain a Positive Body Image.

Authors:  Rafay Atiq
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2005-06

2.  Punjabi immigrant women's breast cancer stories.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Joan L Bottorff; Lynda G Balneaves; Sukhdev K Grewal
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2007-10

Review 3.  Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology?

Authors:  J E Till; H J Sutherland; E M Meslin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality of life research and the ethics of evidence.

Authors:  V Miké
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Patient satisfaction with decision-making for breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  S M Weiss; P A Wengert; E M Martinez; W Sewall; E Kopp
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Unsupportive partner behaviors, social-cognitive processing, and psychological outcomes in couples coping with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Scott Siegel; Shannon Myers Virtue; Carolyn Heckman; Danielle Ryan
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10

8.  Provision and acceptability of day case breast biopsy: an audit of current practice.

Authors:  J M Dixon; A M Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction.

Authors:  Demetris Stavrou; Oren Weissman; Anna Polyniki; Neofytos Papageorgiou; Joseph Haik; Nimrod Farber; Eyal Winkler
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.