Literature DB >> 19327420

Usefulness of coronary fractional flow reserve measurements in guiding clinical decisions in intermediate or equivocal left main coronary stenoses.

Javier Courtis1, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Eric Larose, Jean-Michel Potvin, Jean-Pierre Déry, Robert De Larochellière, Mélanie Côté, Olivier Cousterousse, Can M Nguyen, Guy Proulx, Stéphane Rinfret, Olivier F Bertrand.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the usefulness of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements to guide the clinical decision in patients with intermediate left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and to determine the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) -- cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization -- in such cases; 142 consecutive patients with intermediate LMCA stenosis (mean percent diameter stenosis 42 +/- 13%) were included. All patients underwent FFR measurement after intracoronary administration of adenosine at a dose > or =30 microg. The clinical decisions were based on FFR as follows: coronary revascularization was recommended if FFR was <0.75, medical treatment if FFR was >0.80, and individualized decision based on additional clinical data if FFR was between 0.75 and 0.80. Mean FFR was 0.81 +/- 0.09 after the administration of 176 +/- 99 microg of adenosine. Based on FFR results, 60 patients (42%) underwent coronary revascularization, and 82 patients (58%) received medical treatment. At 14 +/- 11 months follow-up, the incidence of MACE related to the LMCA stenosis was 13% in the medical treatment group and 7% in the revascularization group (p = 0.27). The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was 6% in the medical treatment group and 7% in the revascularization group (p = 0.70). In the medical treatment group, with MACE had received a lower dose of intracoronary adenosine (86 +/- 57 vs 167 +/- 102 microg; odds ratio 1.39 for each decrease of 30 microg of intracoronary adenosine, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.89) and more frequently had diabetes (55% vs 21%; odds ratio 4.40, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 16.42). In conclusion, FFR measurement is helpful in guiding the decision whether to revascularize patients with intermediate LMCA stenosis. However, patients with diabetes remain at higher risk, and higher doses than previously recommended of intracoronary adenosine might have to be used in the evaluation of LMCA stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327420     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial fractional flow reserve. Its role in guiding PCI in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M Lindstaedt; A Mügge
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Value of FFR in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anil Mehra; Bishav Mohan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-03-14

Review 3.  Current Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Intervention.

Authors:  Harsha S Nagarajarao; Chandra P Ojha; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Ahmed Ibrahim; Adriana C Mares; Timir K Paul
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Revascularization in multivessel CAD: a functional approach.

Authors:  Joanne Shannon; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Use of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory to guide treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michael McDaniel; Habib Samady
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-02

Review 6.  Interventional Strategies in Cancer-induced Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Bala Pushparaji; Teodora Donisan; Dinu V Balanescu; Nicolas Palaskas; Peter Kim; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Saamir A Hassan; Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar; Cezar A Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention: integrated use of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Jung-Min Ahn; Soo-Jin Kang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Correlation of Intravascular Ultrasound and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Stephanie C El Hajj; Takumi Toya; Takayuki Warisawa; John Nan; Bradley R Lewis; Christopher M Cook; Christopher Rajkumar; James P Howard; Henry Seligman; Yousif Ahmad; Shunichi Doi; Akihiro Nakajima; Masafumi Nakayama; Sonoka Goto; Rafael Vera-Urquiza; Takao Sato; Yuetsu Kikuta; Yoshiaki Kawase; Hidetaka Nishina; Sunao Nakamura; Hitoshi Matsuo; Javier Escaned; Yoshihiro J Akashi; Justin E Davies; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 7.514

9.  Evaluating the impact of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery lesions on the mode of treatment and their outcomes: An Iranian experience.

Authors:  Alireza Khosravi; Mohammad Reza Pourbehi; Masoud Pourmoghaddas; Afshin Ostovar; Mohammad Reza Akhbari; Fereshteh Ziaee-Bideh; Jafar Golshahi; Shahin Shirani
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2015-03

10.  Invasive and non-invasive fractional flow reserve index in validation of hemodynamic severity of intracoronary lesions.

Authors:  Jarosław Wasilewski; Kryspin Mirota; Michał Hawranek; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.