Literature DB >> 21755348

Myocardial fractional flow reserve. Its role in guiding PCI in stable coronary artery disease.

M Lindstaedt1, A Mügge.   

Abstract

Revascularization of coronary artery lesions should be based on objective evidence of ischemia, as recommended by the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. However, even in the case of stable coronary artery disease and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), pre-procedural noninvasive stress test results are available in a minority of patients only. It is common practice for physicians to make decisions on revascularization in the catheterization laboratory after a cursory review of the angiogram, despite the well-recognized inaccuracy of such an approach. Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a coronary pressure wire is a specific index of the functional significance of a coronary lesion, with superior diagnostic accuracy for the detection of ischemia than any noninvasive stress test. FFR trials on patients with single and multivessel disease, such as the DEFER and FAME studies, have demonstrated that the clinical benefit of PCI with respect to patient outcome is greatest when revascularization is limited to lesions inducing ischemia, whereas lesions not inducing ischemia should be treated medically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21755348     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-011-3486-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  42 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G A Beller; B L Zaret
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Johannes Rieber; Armin Huber; Isabelle Erhard; Silvia Mueller; Michael Schweyer; Andreas Koenig; Thomas M Schiele; Karl Theisen; Uwe Siebert; Stefan O Schoenberg; Maximilian Reiser; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Bon-Kwon Koo; Kyung-Woo Park; Hyun-Jae Kang; Young-Seok Cho; Woo-Young Chung; Tae-Jin Youn; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi; Seung-Jae Tahk; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Narbeh Melikian; Pieter De Bondt; Pim Tonino; Olivier De Winter; Eric Wyffels; Jozef Bartunek; Guy R Heyndrickx; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Clinical outcome following conservative vs revascularization therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements.

Authors:  Michael Lindstaedt; Yasemin Halilcavusogullari; Aydan Yazar; Tim Holland-Letz; Waldemar Bojara; Andreas Mügge; Alfried Germing
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base.

Authors:  E J Topol; S G Ellis; D M Cosgrove; E R Bates; D W Muller; N J Schork; M A Schork; F D Loop
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Sigmund Silber; Per Albertsson; Francisco F Avilés; Paolo G Camici; Antonio Colombo; Christian Hamm; Erik Jørgensen; Jean Marco; Jan-Erik Nordrehaug; Witold Ruzyllo; Philip Urban; Gregg W Stone; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Guoxin Fan; Deqiu Zhu; Wanrong Ma; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  A novel noninvasive method for measuring fractional flow reserve through three-dimensional modeling.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Huijie Lv; Fangyu Zhou; Jiangmin Zhao; Jiahong Xu; Li Xiang; Fei Wang; Qing Zhan; Jinfa Jiang; Junjie Xiao
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.318

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.