Literature DB >> 19327402

Understanding why patients with schizophrenia do not perceive the hollow-mask illusion using dynamic causal modelling.

Danai Dima1, Jonathan P Roiser, Detlef E Dietrich, Catharina Bonnemann, Heinrich Lanfermann, Hinderk M Emrich, Wolfgang Dillo.   

Abstract

Patients suffering from schizophrenia are less susceptible to various visual illusions. For example, healthy participants perceive a hollow mask as a normal face, presumably due to the strength of constraining top-down influences, while patients with schizophrenia do not (Schneider, U., Leweke, F.M., Sternemann, U., Weber, M.M., Emrich, H.M., 1996. Visual 3D illusion: a systems-theoretical approach to psychosis. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 246, 256-260; Scheider, U., Borsutzky, M., Seifert, J., Leweke, F.M., Huber, T.J., Rollnik J.D., Emrich, H.M., 2002. Reduced binocular depth inversion in schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Research 53, 101-108.; Emrich, H.M., Leweke, F.M., Schneider, U., 1997. Towards a cannabinoid hypothesis of schizophrenia: cognitive impairments due to a dysregulation of the endogenous cannabinoid system. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 56, 803-807). However the neural mechanisms underpinning this effect remain poorly understood. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the hollow-mask illusion in schizophrenic patients and healthy controls. The primary aim of this study was to use measures of effective connectivity arising from dynamic causal modelling (DCM) to explain differences in both the perception of the hollow-mask illusion and associated differences in neural responses between patients with schizophrenia and controls, which we hypothesised would be associated with difference in the influences of top-down and bottom-up processes between the groups. Consistent with this explanation, we identified differences between the two groups in effective connectivity. In particular, there was a strengthening of bottom-up processes, and weakening of top-down ones, during the presentation of 'hollow' faces for the patients. In contrast, the controls exhibited a strengthening of top-down processes when perceiving the same stimuli. These findings suggest that schizophrenic patients rely on stimulus-driven processing and are less able to employ conceptually-driven top-down strategies during perception, where incoming sensory data are constrained with reference to a generative model that entails stored information from past experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327402     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  55 in total

Review 1.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Test-retest reliability of effective connectivity in the face perception network.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Frieder Michel Paulus; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Enhanced predictive signalling in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharina Schmack; Marcus Rothkirch; Josef Priller; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Contributions of low and high spatial frequency processing to impaired object recognition circuitry in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Matthew J Hoptman; Antígona Martínez; Sangeeta Nair-Collins; Cristina J Mauro; Moshe Bar; Daniel C Javitt; Pamela D Butler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Segregation of feedforward and feedback projections in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Vladimir K Berezovskii; Jonathan J Nassi; Richard T Born
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Seeing more clearly through psychosis: Depth inversion illusions are normal in bipolar disorder but reduced in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Steven M Silverstein; Yushi Wang; Matthew W Roché; Thomas V Papathomas
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Neural correlates of binocular depth inversion illusion in antipsychotic-naïve first-episode schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Cathrin Rohleder; Dagmar Koethe; Stefan Fritze; Cristina E Topor; F Markus Leweke; Dusan Hirjak
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Learning priors for Bayesian computations in the nervous system.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Martin Voss; Konrad Kording
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reduced depth inversion illusions in schizophrenia are state-specific and occur for multiple object types and viewing conditions.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Steven M Silverstein; Yushi Wang; Thomas V Papathomas
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-05

10.  Stochastic dynamic causal modeling of working memory connections in cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Liangsuo Ma; Joel L Steinberg; Khader M Hasan; Ponnada A Narayana; Larry A Kramer; F Gerard Moeller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.