Literature DB >> 27344363

Seeing more clearly through psychosis: Depth inversion illusions are normal in bipolar disorder but reduced in schizophrenia.

Brian P Keane1, Steven M Silverstein2, Yushi Wang3, Matthew W Roché3, Thomas V Papathomas4.   

Abstract

Schizophrenia patients with more positive symptoms are less susceptible to depth inversion illusions (DIIs) in which concave objects appear as convex. It remains unclear, however, the extent to which this perceptual advantage uniquely characterizes the schizophrenia phenotype. To address the foregoing, we compared 30 bipolar disorder patients to a previously published sample of healthy controls (N=25) and schizophrenia patients (N=30). The task in all cases was to judge the apparent convexity of physically concave faces and scenes. Half of the concave objects were painted with realistic texture to enhance the convexity illusion and the remaining objects were untextured to reduce the illusion. Subjects viewed objects stereoscopically or via monocular motion parallax depth cues. For each group, DIIs were stronger with texture than without, and weaker with stereoscopic information than without, indicating a uniformly normal response to stimulus alterations across groups. Bipolar patients experienced DIIs more frequently than schizophrenia patients but as commonly as controls, irrespective of the face/scene category, texture, or viewing condition (motion/stereo). More severe positive and disorganized symptoms predicted reduced DIIs for schizophrenia patients and across all patients. These results suggest that people with schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder, more accurately perceive object depth structure. Psychotic symptoms-or their accompanying neural dysfunction-may primarily drive the effect presumably through eroding the visual system's generalized tendency to construe unusual or ambiguous surfaces as convex. Because such symptoms are by definition more common in schizophrenia, DIIs are at once state-sensitive and diagnostically specific, offering a potential biomarker for the presence of acute psychosis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular depth inversion; Bipolar disorder; Disorganized symptoms; Hollow mask illusion; Positive symptoms; Prediction-error monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27344363      PMCID: PMC5026901          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  42 in total

1.  Reduced binocular depth inversion in regular cannabis users.

Authors:  David M Semple; Fiona Ramsden; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sherman; Thomas V Papathomas; Anshul Jain; Brian P Keane
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2011-07-19

3.  Reduced binocular depth inversion in schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  U Schneider; M Borsutzky; J Seifert; F M Leweke; T J Huber; J D Rollnik; H M Emrich
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Cognition-UPSA score relationships: a further analysis of Silverstein et al. (2010) data and some caveats.

Authors:  Steven M Silverstein; Sherrie D All; Judith Jaeger
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Cross-diagnostic comparison of visual processing in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carol Jahshan; Jonathan K Wynn; Amanda McCleery; David C Glahn; Lori L Altshuler; Michael F Green
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Impaired top-down processes in schizophrenia: a DCM study of ERPs.

Authors:  Danai Dima; Detlef E Dietrich; Wolfgang Dillo; Hinderk M Emrich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Are there more than two syndromes in schizophrenia? A critique of the positive-negative dichotomy.

Authors:  V Peralta; J de Leon; M J Cuesta
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Understanding why patients with schizophrenia do not perceive the hollow-mask illusion using dynamic causal modelling.

Authors:  Danai Dima; Jonathan P Roiser; Detlef E Dietrich; Catharina Bonnemann; Heinrich Lanfermann; Hinderk M Emrich; Wolfgang Dillo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The computational anatomy of psychosis.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Klaas Enno Stephan; Harriet R Brown; Christopher D Frith; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Dopamine, affordance and active inference.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Tamara Shiner; Thomas FitzGerald; Joseph M Galea; Rick Adams; Harriet Brown; Raymond J Dolan; Rosalyn Moran; Klaas Enno Stephan; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

1.  Disruptions in neural connectivity associated with reduced susceptibility to a depth inversion illusion in youth at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; Steven M Silverstein; Jessica A Bernard; Brian P Keane; Thomas V Papathomas; Andrea Pelletier-Baldelli; Derek J Dean; Raeana E Newberry; Ivanka Ristanovic; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 4.881

2.  Experimental evidence for circular inference in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Renaud Jardri; Sandrine Duverne; Alexandra S Litvinova; Sophie Denève
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  The promise of layer-specific neuroimaging for testing predictive coding theories of psychosis.

Authors:  J Haarsma; P Kok; M Browning
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.662

4.  Visuospatial and Sensory Integration Tasks in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder: Relationship to Body Mass Index and Smoking.

Authors:  Tyler S Vanderhoof; Tamara V Gurvits; Julie E Baker-Nolan; David Borsook; Igor Elman
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Pareidolia in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Eid G Abo Hamza; Szabolcs Kéri; Katalin Csigó; Dalia Bedewy; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.