Literature DB >> 19324897

Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes.

Eric Lonsdorf1, Claire Kremen, Taylor Ricketts, Rachael Winfree, Neal Williams, Sarah Greenleaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crop pollination by bees and other animals is an essential ecosystem service. Ensuring the maintenance of the service requires a full understanding of the contributions of landscape elements to pollinator populations and crop pollination. Here, the first quantitative model that predicts pollinator abundance on a landscape is described and tested.
METHODS: Using information on pollinator nesting resources, floral resources and foraging distances, the model predicts the relative abundance of pollinators within nesting habitats. From these nesting areas, it then predicts relative abundances of pollinators on the farms requiring pollination services. Model outputs are compared with data from coffee in Costa Rica, watermelon and sunflower in California and watermelon in New Jersey-Pennsylvania (NJPA). KEY
RESULTS: Results from Costa Rica and California, comparing field estimates of pollinator abundance, richness or services with model estimates, are encouraging, explaining up to 80 % of variance among farms. However, the model did not predict observed pollinator abundances on NJPA, so continued model improvement and testing are necessary. The inability of the model to predict pollinator abundances in the NJPA landscape may be due to not accounting for fine-scale floral and nesting resources within the landscapes surrounding farms, rather than the logic of our model.
CONCLUSIONS: The importance of fine-scale resources for pollinator service delivery was supported by sensitivity analyses indicating that the model's predictions depend largely on estimates of nesting and floral resources within crops. Despite the need for more research at the finer-scale, the approach fills an important gap by providing quantitative and mechanistic model from which to evaluate policy decisions and develop land-use plans that promote pollination conservation and service delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324897      PMCID: PMC2701767          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  15 in total

1.  Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Testing simple indices of habitat proximity.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Jonathan Dushoff; Elizabeth E Crone; Cheryl B Schultz; Robert V Budny; Neal M Williams; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Entomology. The case of the empty hives.

Authors:  Erik Stokstad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape.

Authors:  Neal M Williams; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?

Authors:  Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield.

Authors:  Patrick Hoehn; Teja Tscharntke; Jason M Tylianakis; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Conservation planning for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Kai M A Chan; M Rebecca Shaw; David R Cameron; Emma C Underwood; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca E Irwin; Rebecca J Flanagan; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  New frontiers in competition for pollination.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca J Flanagan; Beverly J Brown; Nickolas M Waser; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging.

Authors:  Shalene Jha; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Demographic benefits of early season resources for bumble bee (B. vosnesenskii) colonies.

Authors:  Rosemary L Malfi; Elizabeth Crone; Neal Williams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States.

Authors:  Insu Koh; Eric V Lonsdorf; Neal M Williams; Claire Brittain; Rufus Isaacs; Jason Gibbs; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A novel method for assessing risks to pollinators from plant protection products using honeybees as a model species.

Authors:  Stefania Barmaz; Simon G Potts; Marco Vighi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory.

Authors:  Ola Olsson; Arvid Bolin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination.

Authors:  Andrea Holzschuh; Carsten F Dormann; Teja Tscharntke; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Ecosystem services in conservation planning: targeted benefits vs. co-benefits or costs?

Authors:  Kai M A Chan; Lara Hoshizaki; Brian Klinkenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.

Authors:  Jesse D Gourevitch; Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez; Natalia Aristizábal; Luz A de Wit; Eva Kinnebrew; Caitlin E Littlefield; Maya Moore; Charles C Nicholson; Aaron J Schwartz; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.