Literature DB >> 19324742

Trill consistency is an age-related assessment signal in banded wrens.

Selvino R de Kort1, Erin R B Eldermire, Sandra Valderrama, Carlos A Botero, Sandra L Vehrencamp.   

Abstract

Older males tend to have a competitive advantage over younger males in sexual selection. Therefore, it is expected that signals used in sexual selection change with age. Although song repertoire size in songbirds is often mentioned as an age-related trait, many species, including the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus), do not increase their repertoires after the first year. Here, we show that banded wrens reproduce the trill notes in their songs with less variability between them (i.e. more consistently) when they grow older. In a playback experiment, we also show that banded wrens discriminate between younger and older birds based on structural aspects of their song. In a second experiment, banded wrens also respond differentially to natural songs versus songs with artificially enhanced consistency. We argue that consistency in trill note reproduction may be achieved through practice. Sexual selection in the form of male-male competition may therefore operate on a phenotypic trait, the expression of which is enhanced by practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324742      PMCID: PMC2677607          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of 'crystallized' adult birdsong.

Authors:  Evren C Tumer; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Communication of male quality in owl hoots.

Authors:  Loïc A Hardouin; David Reby; Christian Bavoux; Guy Burneleau; Vincent Bretagnolle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Song types and their structural features are associated with specific contexts in the banded wren.

Authors:  P A Trillo; S L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren.

Authors:  Anya E Illes; Michelle L Hall; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Discrimination of the spatial distribution of concurrently active sound sources: some experiments with stereophonic arrays.

Authors:  D R Perrott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song.

Authors:  Tudor I Drăgănoiu; Laurent Nagle; Michel Kreutzer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Migration strategy and divergent sexual selection on bird song.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Selvino R de Kort; Javier Pérez-Tris; José Luis Tellería
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective.

Authors:  Sandra L Vehrencamp; Michelle L Hall; Erin R Bohman; Catherine D Depeine; Anastasia H Dalziell
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  How reliable are the methods for estimating repertoire size?

Authors:  Carlos A Botero; Andrew E Mudge; Amanda M Koltz; Wesley M Hochachka; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 1.897

10.  Syllable Type Consistency is Related to Age, Social Status, and Reproductive Success in the Tropical Mockingbird.

Authors:  Carlos A Botero; Rachel J Rossman; Lina M Caro; Laura M Stenzler; Irby J Lovette; Selvino R De Kort; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Delayed song maturation and territorial aggression in a songbird.

Authors:  Angelika Poesel; Douglas A Nelson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Female Lincoln's sparrows modulate their behavior in response to variation in male song quality.

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Kendra B Sewall; Katrina G Salvante; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Responses to song playback vary with the vocal performance of both signal senders and receivers.

Authors:  Dana L Moseley; David C Lahti; Jeffrey Podos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  A systems approach to animal communication.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets; Andrew B Barron; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Mark E Hauber; Paul H Mason; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Songs differing in consistency elicit differential aggressive response in territorial birds.

Authors:  Hector Fabio Rivera-Gutierrez; Rianne Pinxten; Marcel Eens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Song environment affects singing effort and vasotocin immunoreactivity in the forebrain of male Lincoln's sparrows.

Authors:  Kendra B Sewall; Elyse C Dankoski; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Trill performance components vary with age, season, and motivation in the banded wren.

Authors:  S L Vehrencamp; J Yantachka; M L Hall; S R de Kort
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Learn it now, sing it later? Field and laboratory studies on song repertoire acquisition and song use in nightingales.

Authors:  S Kiefer; C Scharff; H Hultsch; S Kipper
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-09-10

10.  Climatic patterns predict the elaboration of song displays in mockingbirds.

Authors:  Carlos A Botero; Neeltje J Boogert; Sandra L Vehrencamp; Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.