Literature DB >> 17173097

Song types and their structural features are associated with specific contexts in the banded wren.

P A Trillo, S L Vehrencamp.   

Abstract

We studied the use of song types and their acoustic features in different social contexts in the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus), a resident tropical songbird in which males possess about 20 distinctive song types varying in duration, bandwidth, note composition, and trill structure. We recorded six focal males intensively for four days each while we observed context information such as during versus after dawn chorus, presence of the female, counter-versus solo-singing, location at the edge versus centre of the territory, and proximity to the nest. All males used at least some song types differentially during each of these pairs of alternative contexts. Males also preferentially used the song types they shared with a given neighbour when interacting with that bird. Songs delivered during dawn chorus were significantly longer, wider in bandwidth, often compound (double songs), and more likely to contain a rattle or buzz and an up-sweeping trill, compared to songs delivered after dawn chorus. Similar features were also more commonly observed when birds were engaged in intense male-male interactions and boundary disputes after dawn chorus, especially when countersinging at the edge of the territory. The presence of the female caused the male to deliver song types with narrower whole-song and trill bandwidth and fewer rattles and buzzes, and song-type diversity and fraction of compound songs were higher when the female was present. Thus, in addition to using type matching and variations in song-type switching and diversity to signal different levels of aggressive intention, male banded wrens also select song types based on their acoustic structure in different social contexts.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 17173097      PMCID: PMC1702368          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  2 in total

1.  Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: evidence for auditory conventional signals.

Authors:  L E Molles; S L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions?

Authors:  S L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total
  20 in total

1.  Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females.

Authors:  Michelle L Hall; Anya Illes; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Escalation of aggressive vocal signals: a sequential playback study.

Authors:  David Hof; Jeffrey Podos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Negotiation of territorial boundaries in a songbird.

Authors:  Sandra L Vehrencamp; Jesse M Ellis; Brett F Cropp; John M Koltz
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Acetylcholine acts on songbird premotor circuitry to invigorate vocal output.

Authors:  Paul I Jaffe; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren.

Authors:  Anya E Illes; Michelle L Hall; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Trill performance components vary with age, season, and motivation in the banded wren.

Authors:  S L Vehrencamp; J Yantachka; M L Hall; S R de Kort
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Trill consistency is an age-related assessment signal in banded wrens.

Authors:  Selvino R de Kort; Erin R B Eldermire; Sandra Valderrama; Carlos A Botero; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective.

Authors:  Sandra L Vehrencamp; Michelle L Hall; Erin R Bohman; Catherine D Depeine; Anastasia H Dalziell
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species.

Authors:  Nicole Geberzahn; Wolfgang Goymann; Christina Muck; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Songbirds can learn flexible contextual control over syllable sequencing.

Authors:  Lena Veit; Lucas Y Tian; Christian J Monroy Hernandez; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.