Literature DB >> 18392112

Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective.

Sandra L Vehrencamp1, Michelle L Hall, Erin R Bohman, Catherine D Depeine, Anastasia H Dalziell.   

Abstract

Interpreting receiver responses to on-territory playback of aggressive signals is problematic. One solution is to combine such receiver-perspective experiments with a sender-perspective experiment that allows subjects to demonstrate how their choice of singing strategies is associated with their approach behavior. Here we report the results of a sender-perspective study on the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus), and combine information on context and results of previous receiver-perspective experiments to clarify function. Territorial males were presented with a 5-min playback consisting of song types present in their repertoire. We assessed the degree to which the subjects' song matching rate, overlapping rate, and song-type versatility were correlated with their approach latency, closeness of approach, latency to first retreat, and time spent close to the speaker. Male age, breeding stage, and features of the playback stimuli were also considered. Song matching was associated with rapid and close approach, consistent with the receiver-perspective interpretation of type matching as a conventional signal of aggressive motivation. Overlapping was associated with earlier retreat, and together with the aversive receiver response to our previous overlapping playback experiment suggests that overlapping is a defensive withdrawal signal. High versatility was associated with slower first retreat from the speaker and high levels of reciprocal matching between subject and playback. Males with fledglings sang with particularly low versatility and approached the speaker aggressively, whereas males with nestlings overlapped more and retreated quickly. Finally, older males matched more but overlapped less.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18392112      PMCID: PMC2288572          DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol        ISSN: 1045-2249            Impact factor:   2.671


  9 in total

1.  Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: evidence for auditory conventional signals.

Authors:  L E Molles; S L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females.

Authors:  Michelle L Hall; Anya Illes; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Communication of male quality in owl hoots.

Authors:  Loïc A Hardouin; David Reby; Christian Bavoux; Guy Burneleau; Vincent Bretagnolle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Song types and their structural features are associated with specific contexts in the banded wren.

Authors:  P A Trillo; S L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Stronger territorial responses to frequency modulated coos in collared doves

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren.

Authors:  Anya E Illes; Michelle L Hall; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Why are there so many threat displays?

Authors:  M Andersson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication.

Authors:  R M Seyfarth; D L Cheney; P Marler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions?

Authors:  S L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Escalation of aggressive vocal signals: a sequential playback study.

Authors:  David Hof; Jeffrey Podos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Is bird song a reliable signal of aggressive intent?

Authors:  Mark E Laidre; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Negotiation of territorial boundaries in a songbird.

Authors:  Sandra L Vehrencamp; Jesse M Ellis; Brett F Cropp; John M Koltz
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 5.  Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Daniel T Blumstein; Marie A Roch; Çağlar Akçay; Gregory Backus; Mark A Bee; Kirsten Bohn; Yan Cao; Gerald Carter; Cristiane Cäsar; Michael Coen; Stacy L DeRuiter; Laurance Doyle; Shimon Edelman; Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho; Todd M Freeberg; Ellen C Garland; Morgan Gustison; Heidi E Harley; Chloé Huetz; Melissa Hughes; Julia Hyland Bruno; Amiyaal Ilany; Dezhe Z Jin; Michael Johnson; Chenghui Ju; Jeremy Karnowski; Bernard Lohr; Marta B Manser; Brenda McCowan; Eduardo Mercado; Peter M Narins; Alex Piel; Megan Rice; Roberta Salmi; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Laela Sayigh; Yu Shiu; Charles Taylor; Edgar E Vallejo; Sara Waller; Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-11-26

Review 6.  Vocal matching: the what, the why and the how.

Authors:  Stephanie L King; Peter K McGregor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Social regulation of electric signal plasticity in male Brachyhypopomus gauderio.

Authors:  Sat Gavassa; James P Roach; Philip K Stoddard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Mutual visual signalling between the cleaner shrimp Ancylomenes pedersoni and its client fish.

Authors:  Eleanor M Caves; Patrick A Green; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Trill performance components vary with age, season, and motivation in the banded wren.

Authors:  S L Vehrencamp; J Yantachka; M L Hall; S R de Kort
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Trill consistency is an age-related assessment signal in banded wrens.

Authors:  Selvino R de Kort; Erin R B Eldermire; Sandra Valderrama; Carlos A Botero; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.