Literature DB >> 19324365

Processing prosodic structure by adults with language-based learning disability.

Megha Bahl1, Elena Plante, LouAnn Gerken.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Two experiments investigated the ability of adults with a history of language-based learning disability (hLLD) and their normal language (NL) peers to learn prosodic patterns of a novel language. Participants were exposed to stimuli from an artificial language and tested on items that required generalization of the stress patterns and the hierarchical principles of stress assignment that could be inferred from the input. In Study 1, the NL group successfully generalized the patterns of stress heard during familiarization, but failed to show generalization of the hierarchical principles. The hLLD group performed at chance for both types of generalization items. In Study 2, the intensity of stress elements was increased. The performance of the NL group improved whereas the hLLD groups' performance decreased on both types of generalization items. The results indicate that NL adults are able to successfully abstract the complex hierarchical rules of stress if the prosodic cues are made sufficiently salient, but this same task is difficult for adults with hLLD. LEARNING OUTCOMES: The reader will be able to understand: (1) the difference in the ability of hLLD and NL adults to process stress assignment in an implicit learning context and (2) that typical adults can abstract complex hierarchical rules of stress assignment when provided with strong cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324365      PMCID: PMC2856440          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  11 in total

1.  The beginnings of word segmentation in english-learning infants.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; D M Houston; M Newsome
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns?

Authors:  S L Mattys; P W Jusczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants.

Authors:  S L Mattys; P W Jusczyk; P A Luce; J L Morgan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Subcategory learning in normal and language learning-disabled adults: how much information do they need?

Authors:  Jessica Richardson; Laurel Harris; Elena Plante; Louann Gerken
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Does sentential prosody help infants organize and remember speech information?

Authors:  D R Mandel; P W Jusczyk; D G Nelson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-11

7.  Children use canonical sentence schemas: a crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections.

Authors:  D I Slobin; T G Bever
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1982-11

8.  On the discovery of novel wordlike units from utterances: an artificial-language study with implications for native-language acquisition.

Authors:  D Dahan; M R Brent
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-06

9.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Erik D Thiessen; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2003-07

10.  Nine-month-olds extract structural principles required for natural language.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Implicit language learning: Adults' ability to segment words in Norwegian.

Authors:  Megan M Kittleson; Jessica M Aguilar; Gry Line Tokerud; Elena Plante; Arve E Asbjørnsen
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2010-10

2.  Children with specific language impairment show rapid, implicit learning of stress assignment rules.

Authors:  Elena Plante; Megha Bahl; Rebecca Vance; Louann Gerken
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 3.  Activity and participation characteristics of adults with learning disabilities--a systematic review.

Authors:  Kineret Sharfi; Sara Rosenblum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Learning novel words: detail and vulnerability of initial representations for children with specific language impairment and typically developing peers.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Rachael Suddarth
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Exemplar variability facilitates rapid learning of an otherwise unlearnable grammar by individuals with language-based learning disability.

Authors:  Janne von Koss Torkildsen; Natalie S Dailey; Jessica M Aguilar; Rebecca Gómez; Elena Plante
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken; Elena Plante; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.