Comparison of short term indirect calorimetry and doubly labeled water method for the assessment of energy expenditure in preterm infants.

The accuracy of 8-hour indirect calorimetry (IDC) as an estimate of energy expenditure was investigated in 8 healthy preterm infants (birth weight 1,270 +/- 193 g, gestational age 32 +/- 3 weeks, mean +/- SD) in comparison with an analysis over 5 days using the doubly-labeled water (2H2(18)O) method (DLW). The infants that were fed continuously by nasogastric drip with 120 kcal/kg/day of special infant formula were measured twice under thermoneutral conditions in a closed system indirect calorimeter during 8 h with a 4-day interval; simultaneously isotope decay was measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometry in urine samples collected daily during 5 days from 6 h after an oral dose of 2H2(18)O on the first day of IDC, all during the 4th postnatal week. The mean differences between carbon dioxide production rate (rCO2) measured either by single 8-hour IDC or by duplicate 8-hour IDC and the 5-day DLW method, using the two-point analysis or the multipoint analysis were not significantly different from zero. The rCO2 calculated from the DLW method using the two-point analysis differed -1.4 +/- 1.7% from that measured by the multipoint analysis. The mean differences between the metabolic rate estimated from 8 h of IDC and from the 5-day DLW method based on a measured RQ of 0.90 was -6.7 +/- 6.2% and based on the RQ of the feeding -4.5 +/- 6.0%. These differences were not significantly different from zero. We conclude that IDC over 8 h and two-point DLW measurement over 5 days, both methods that can be applied with relative ease in practice, offer an adequate average estimate of energy expenditure in continuously fed preterm infants under thermoneutral conditions.