Literature DB >> 19323757

Effect of various encapsulating materials on the stability of probiotic bacteria.

W K Ding1, N P Shah.   

Abstract

Ten probiotic bacteria, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum, L. salivarius, L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, L. paracasei, B. lactis type Bl-04, B. lactis type Bi-07, HOWARU L. rhamnosus, and HOWARU B. bifidum, were encapsulated in various coating materials, namely alginate, guar gum, xanthan gum, locust bean gum, and carrageenan gum. The various encapsulated probiotic bacteria were studied for their acid and bile tolerance. Free probiotic organisms were used as a control. The acid tolerance of probiotic organisms was tested at pH 2 over a 2-h incubation period. Bile tolerance was tested with taurocholic acid over an 8-h incubation period. The permeability of the capsules was also examined using a water-soluble dye, 6-carboxyflourescin (6-CF). The permeability was monitored by measuring the amount of 6-CF released from the capsules during a 2-w storage period. Results indicated that probiotic bacteria encapsulated in alginate, xanthan gum, and carrageenan gum survived better (P < 0.05) than free probiotic bacteria, under acidic conditions. When free probiotic bacteria were exposed to taurocholic acid, viability was reduced by 6.36 log CFU/mL, whereas only 3.63, 3.27, and 4.12 log CFU/mL was lost in probiotic organisms encapsulated in alginate, xanthan gum, and carrageenan gum, respectively. All encapsulating materials tested released small amounts of 6-CF; however, alginate and xanthan gum retained 22.1% and 18.6% more fluorescent dye than guar gum. In general, microcapsules made of alginate, xanthan gum, and carrageenan gum greatly improved the survival of probiotic bacteria when exposed to acidic conditions and bile salts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19323757     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01067.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  16 in total

Review 1.  Technology and potential applications of probiotic encapsulation in fermented milk products.

Authors:  Siavash Iravani; Hassan Korbekandi; Seyed Vahid Mirmohammadi
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Effect of Encapsulation on Viability of Pediococcus pentosaceus OZF During Its Passage Through the Gastrointestinal Tract Model.

Authors:  Fadime Kiran; Mohamed Mokrani; Ozlem Osmanagaoglu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  How do bifidobacteria counteract environmental challenges? Mechanisms involved and physiological consequences.

Authors:  Lorena Ruiz; Patricia Ruas-Madiedo; Miguel Gueimonde; Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán; Abelardo Margolles; Borja Sánchez
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.523

4.  Survival and behavior of free and encapsulated probiotic bacteria under simulated human gastrointestinal and technological conditions.

Authors:  Muhammad Zeashan; Muhammad Afzaal; Farhan Saeed; Aftab Ahmed; Tabussam Tufail; Awais Ahmed; Faqir Muhammad Anjum
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  The Production of Synbiotic Bread by Microencapsulation.

Authors:  Mojan Seyedain-Ardabili; Anousheh Sharifan; Babak Ghiassi Tarzi
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 6.  Materials Used for the Microencapsulation of Probiotic Bacteria in the Food Industry.

Authors:  Ewa Kowalska; Małgorzata Ziarno; Adam Ekielski; Tomasz Żelaziński
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.927

7.  Survival and Goat Milk Acidifying Activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Encapsulated with Agave Fructans in a Buttermilk Protein Matrix.

Authors:  Octavio Alvarado-Reveles; Silvia Fernández-Michel; Rafael Jiménez-Flores; Cristina Cueto-Wong; Luz Vázquez-Moreno; Gabriela Ramos-Clamont Montfort
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Cell viability of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis under freeze-drying, storage and gastrointestinal tract simulation conditions.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamekhi; Mustafa Shuhaimi; Arbakariya Ariff; Yazid A Manap
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Green tea increases the survival yield of Bifidobacteria in simulated gastrointestinal environment and during refrigerated conditions.

Authors:  Dan C Vodnar; Carmen Socaciu
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Micro- and nanotechnological delivery platforms for treatment of dysbiosis-related inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Dingpei Long; Didier Merlin
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.