Literature DB >> 19323181

Carbon dynamics of Oregon and Northern California forests and potential land-based carbon storage.

Tara Hudiburg1, Beverly Law, David P Turner, John Campbell, Dan Donato, Maureen Duane.   

Abstract

Net uptake of carbon from the atmosphere (net ecosystem production, NEP) is dependent on climate, disturbance history, management practices, forest age, and forest type. To improve understanding of the influence of these factors on forest carbon stocks and flux in the western United States, federal inventory data and supplemental field measurements at additional plots were used to estimate several important components of the carbon balance in forests in Oregon and Northern California during the 1990s. Species- and ecoregion-specific allometric equations were used to estimate live and dead biomass stores, net primary productivity (NPP), and mortality. In the semiarid East Cascades and mesic Coast Range, mean total biomass was 8 and 24 kg C/m2, and mean NPP was 0.30 and 0.78 kg C.m(-2).yr(-1), respectively. Maximum NPP and dead biomass stores were most influenced by climate, whereas maximum live biomass stores and mortality were most influenced by forest type. Within ecoregions, mean live and dead biomass were usually higher on public lands, primarily because of the younger age class distribution on private lands. Decrease in NPP with age was not general across ecoregions, with no marked decline in old stands (>200 years old) in some ecoregions. In the absence of stand-replacing disturbance, total landscape carbon stocks could theoretically increase from 3.2 +/- 0.34 Pg C to 5.9 +/- 1.34 Pg C (a 46% increase) if forests were managed for maximum carbon storage. Although the theoretical limit is probably unattainable, given the timber-based economy and fire regimes in some ecoregions, there is still potential to significantly increase the land-based carbon storage by increasing rotation age and reducing harvest rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19323181     DOI: 10.1890/07-2006.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  19 in total

1.  Ecosystem carbon stocks and sequestration potential of federal lands across the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Zhengxi Tan; Shuguang Liu; Terry L Sohl; Yiping Wu; Claudia J Young
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Carbon cycling and net ecosystem production at an early stage of secondary succession in an abandoned coppice forest.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Ohtsuka; Yoko Shizu; Ai Nishiwaki; Yuichiro Yashiro; Hiroshi Koizumi
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 3.  Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-05-22

4.  Plant traits, productivity, biomass and soil properties from forest sites in the Pacific Northwest, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Logan T Berner; Beverly E Law
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Can we set a global threshold age to define mature forests?

Authors:  Philip Martin; Martin Jung; Francis Q Brearley; Relena R Ribbons; Emily R Lines; Aerin L Jacob
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Ecosystem management and land conservation can substantially contribute to California's climate mitigation goals.

Authors:  D Richard Cameron; David C Marvin; Jonathan M Remucal; Michelle C Passero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Aboveground biomass estimation at different scales for subtropical forests in China.

Authors:  Shunlei Peng; Nianpeng He; Guirui Yu; Qiufeng Wang
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.787

8.  Influence of site index on the relationship between forest net primary productivity and stand age.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Jing M Chen; Xiguang Yang; Wenyi Fan; Mingze Li; Liming He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Complex mountain terrain and disturbance history drive variation in forest aboveground live carbon density in the western Oregon Cascades, USA.

Authors:  Harold S J Zald; Thomas A Spies; Rupert Seidl; Robert J Pabst; Keith A Olsen; E Ashley Steel
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Carbon accretion in unthinned and thinned young-growth forest stands of the Alaskan perhumid coastal temperate rainforest.

Authors:  David V D'Amore; Kiva L Oken; Paul A Herendeen; E Ashley Steel; Paul E Hennon
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2015-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.