Literature DB >> 27041818

Complex mountain terrain and disturbance history drive variation in forest aboveground live carbon density in the western Oregon Cascades, USA.

Harold S J Zald1, Thomas A Spies2, Rupert Seidl3, Robert J Pabst1, Keith A Olsen1, E Ashley Steel4.   

Abstract

Forest carbon (C) density varies tremendously across space due to the inherent heterogeneity of forest ecosystems. Variation of forest C density is especially pronounced in mountainous terrain, where environmental gradients are compressed and vary at multiple spatial scales. Additionally, the influence of environmental gradients may vary with forest age and developmental stage, an important consideration as forest landscapes often have a diversity of stand ages from past management and other disturbance agents. Quantifying forest C density and its underlying environmental determinants in mountain terrain has remained challenging because many available data sources lack the spatial grain and ecological resolution needed at both stand and landscape scales. The objective of this study was to determine if environmental factors influencing aboveground live carbon (ALC) density differed between young versus old forests. We integrated aerial light detection and ranging (lidar) data with 702 field plots to map forest ALC density at a grain of 25 m across the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, a 6369 ha watershed in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, USA. We used linear regressions, random forest ensemble learning (RF) and sequential autoregressive modeling (SAR) to reveal how mapped forest ALC density was related to climate, topography, soils, and past disturbance history (timber harvesting and wildfires). ALC increased with stand age in young managed forests, with much greater variation of ALC in relation to years since wildfire in old unmanaged forests. Timber harvesting was the most important driver of ALC across the entire watershed, despite occurring on only 23% of the landscape. More variation in forest ALC density was explained in models of young managed forests than in models of old unmanaged forests. Besides stand age, ALC density in young managed forests was driven by factors influencing site productivity, whereas variation in ALC density in old unmanaged forests was also affected by finer scale topographic conditions associated with sheltered sites. Past wildfires only had a small influence on current ALC density, which may be a result of long times since fire and/or prevalence of non-stand replacing fire. Our results indicate that forest ALC density depends on a suite of multi-scale environmental drivers mediated by complex mountain topography, and that these relationships are dependent on stand age. The high and context-dependent spatial variability of forest ALC density has implications for quantifying forest carbon stores, establishing upper bounds of potential carbon sequestration, and scaling field data to landscape and regional scales.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forest carbon; Forest management; Landscape heterogeneity; Lidar; Topography; Wildfire

Year:  2016        PMID: 27041818      PMCID: PMC4816204          DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  For Ecol Manage        ISSN: 0378-1127            Impact factor:   3.558


  25 in total

1.  The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest.

Authors:  Brady S Hardiman; Gil Bohrer; Christopher M Gough; Christoph S Vogel; Peter S Curtisi
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon.

Authors:  Gregory P Asner; George V N Powell; Joseph Mascaro; David E Knapp; John K Clark; James Jacobson; Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin; Aravindh Balaji; Guayana Paez-Acosta; Eloy Victoria; Laura Secada; Michael Valqui; R Flint Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Random forests for classification in ecology.

Authors:  D Richard Cutler; Thomas C Edwards; Karen H Beard; Adele Cutler; Kyle T Hess; Jacob Gibson; Joshua J Lawler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Fuel treatments and landform modify landscape patterns of burn severity in an extreme fire event.

Authors:  Susan J Prichard; Maureen C Kennedy
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  A large-scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human-modified tropical forests.

Authors:  Erika Berenguer; Joice Ferreira; Toby Alan Gardner; Luiz Eduardo Oliveira Cruz Aragão; Plínio Barbosa De Camargo; Carlos Eduardo Cerri; Mariana Durigan; Raimundo Cosme De Oliveira Junior; Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira; Jos Barlow
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere.

Authors:  R Oren; D S Ellsworth; K H Johnsen; N Phillips; B E Ewers; C Maier; K V Schäfer; H McCarthy; G Hendrey; S G McNulty; G G Katul
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Potential site productivity influences the rate of forest structural development.

Authors:  Andrew J Larson; James A Lutz; Rolf F Gersonde; Jerry F Franklin; Forest F Hietpasi
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Carbon dynamics of Oregon and Northern California forests and potential land-based carbon storage.

Authors:  Tara Hudiburg; Beverly Law; David P Turner; John Campbell; Dan Donato; Maureen Duane
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change.

Authors:  W A Kurz; C C Dymond; G Stinson; G J Rampley; E T Neilson; A L Carroll; T Ebata; L Safranyik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Natural disturbances are spatially diverse but temporally synchronized across temperate forest landscapes in Europe.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 13.211

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.