Literature DB >> 26417074

Ecosystem carbon stocks and sequestration potential of federal lands across the conterminous United States.

Zhengxi Tan1, Shuguang Liu2, Terry L Sohl3, Yiping Wu4, Claudia J Young5.   

Abstract

Federal lands across the conterminous United States (CONUS) account for 23.5% of the CONUS terrestrial area but have received no systematic studies on their ecosystem carbon (C) dynamics and contribution to the national C budgets. The methodology for US Congress-mandated national biological C sequestration potential assessment was used to evaluate ecosystem C dynamics in CONUS federal lands at present and in the future under three Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Emission Scenarios (IPCC SRES) A1B, A2, and B1. The total ecosystem C stock was estimated as 11,613 Tg C in 2005 and projected to be 13,965 Tg C in 2050, an average increase of 19.4% from the baseline. The projected annual C sequestration rate (in kilograms of carbon per hectare per year) from 2006 to 2050 would be sinks of 620 and 228 for forests and grasslands, respectively, and C sources of 13 for shrublands. The federal lands' contribution to the national ecosystem C budget could decrease from 23.3% in 2005 to 20.8% in 2050. The C sequestration potential in the future depends not only on the footprint of individual ecosystems but also on each federal agency's land use and management. The results presented here update our current knowledge about the baseline ecosystem C stock and sequestration potential of federal lands, which would be useful for federal agencies to decide management practices to achieve the national greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation goal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biogeochemical modeling; ecosystem carbon dynamics; federal lands; land use and land cover; nonfederal lands

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26417074      PMCID: PMC4611613          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1512542112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The U.S. Carbon budget: contributions from land-Use change

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Carbon dynamics of Oregon and Northern California forests and potential land-based carbon storage.

Authors:  Tara Hudiburg; Beverly Law; David P Turner; John Campbell; Dan Donato; Maureen Duane
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.657

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Converting highly productive arable cropland in Europe to grassland: -a poor candidate for carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Paul Gosling; Christopher van der Gast; Gary D Bending
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Conservation of carbon resources and values on public lands: A case study from the National Wildlife Refuge System.

Authors:  Zhiliang Zhu; Beth Middleton; Emily Pindilli; Darren Johnson; Kurt Johnson; Scott Covington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Country-level land carbon sink and its causing components by the middle of the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lifen Jiang; Junyi Liang; Xingjie Lu; Enqing Hou; Forrest M Hoffman; Yiqi Luo
Journal:  Ecol Process       Date:  2021-09-14

4.  Estimating carbon sequestration in the piedmont ecoregion of the United States from 1971 to 2010.

Authors:  Jinxun Liu; Benjamin M Sleeter; Zhiliang Zhu; Linda S Heath; Zhengxi Tan; Tamara S Wilson; Jason Sherba; Decheng Zhou
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2016-06-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.