T H Lüning1, E-J Spillenaar-Bilgen. 1. Department of Surgery, Alysis Zorggroep, locatie Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands. T.luning@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the complication and infection risks following extra-peritoneal onlay mesh placement in parastomal hernia repair. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication of enterostomata. Fascial repair using a prosthetic mesh has been generally accepted as the best method of parastomal hernia repair. New studies suggest the use of a prophylactic mesh placement at the initial operation, but fear of wound infection and mesh removal is still high. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records was performed of all patients with extra-peritoneal parastomal hernia repair using a prosthetic mesh between 1997 and 2006. The patient demographic data, enterostomy indication, therapy, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: In the 10-year study period, 16 parastomal hernia repairs using an extra-peritoneal prosthetic mesh in the onlay position were performed. In one patient, a mesh infection occurred, resulting in mesh removal (6.2%). The recurrence rate was 19% after a mean follow-up of 33 months. CONCLUSION: Parastomal hernia repair using a prosthetic mesh is a safe and effective method, with the lowest recurrence rates and acceptably low infection rates. Prosthetic materials should not be used in cases of fecal contamination.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the complication and infection risks following extra-peritoneal onlay mesh placement in parastomal hernia repair. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. BACKGROUND:Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication of enterostomata. Fascial repair using a prosthetic mesh has been generally accepted as the best method of parastomal hernia repair. New studies suggest the use of a prophylactic mesh placement at the initial operation, but fear of wound infection and mesh removal is still high. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records was performed of all patients with extra-peritoneal parastomal hernia repair using a prosthetic mesh between 1997 and 2006. The patient demographic data, enterostomy indication, therapy, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: In the 10-year study period, 16 parastomal hernia repairs using an extra-peritoneal prosthetic mesh in the onlay position were performed. In one patient, a mesh infection occurred, resulting in mesh removal (6.2%). The recurrence rate was 19% after a mean follow-up of 33 months. CONCLUSION:Parastomal hernia repair using a prosthetic mesh is a safe and effective method, with the lowest recurrence rates and acceptably low infection rates. Prosthetic materials should not be used in cases of fecal contamination.
Authors: Timothy A Bigelow; Clayton L Thomas; Huaiqing Wu; Kamal M F Itani Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Timothy A Bigelow; Clayton L Thomas; Huaiqing Wu; Kamal M F Itani Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Timothy A Bigelow; Clayton L Thomas; Huaiqing Wu; Kamal M F Itani Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 2.725