Literature DB >> 12727563

Is parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe?

Scott R Steele1, Patrick Lee, Matthew J Martin, Philip S Mullenix, Eugene S Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern over the safety of polypropylene mesh in parastomal hernia repairs has led some to avoid its use. We reviewed our rate of complications and outcomes with polypropylene mesh.
METHODS: From January 1988 through May 2002, 58 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. After closure of the fascia, the stoma was pulled through the center of the mesh, which was placed either above or below the fascia. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors for the development of complications.
RESULTS: There were 31 end colostomies, 24 end ileostomies, and 3 loop transverse colostomies. Mean follow-up with 50.6 months. Overall complications related to the polypropylene mesh was 36% (recurrence 26%, surgical bowel obstruction 9%, prolapse 3%, wound infection 3%, fistula 3%, and mesh erosion 2%). None of the patients had extirpation of their mesh. Complications were significantly associated with younger age (59.6 versus 67 years, P = 0.04). Cancer patients with stomas had fewer complications (P = 0.02, odds ratio 0.34). Inflammatory bowel disease, stomal type, mesh location, urgent procedures, steroid use, and surgical approaches were not significantly associated with an increased complication rate. Of the 15 patients with recurrence, 7 underwent successful repair for an overall success rate of 86%.
CONCLUSIONS: Parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh is safe and effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12727563     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00040-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  36 in total

1.  Parastomal hernia repair outcomes in relation to stoma site with diisocyanate cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen mesh.

Authors:  N J Smart; R Velineni; D Khan; I R Daniels
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Seung Chul Heo; Heung-Kwon Oh; Yoon Suk Song; Mi Sun Seo; Eun Kyung Choe; Seungbum Ryoo; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-08-31

4.  Is the Lichtenstein operation of strangulated groin hernia a safe procedure?

Authors:  Andrzej Wysocki; Jan Kulawik; Marek Poźniczek; Marcin Strzałka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair.

Authors:  R O Craft; K L Huguet; E C McLemore; K L Harold
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

8.  Parastomal hernia repair using cross-linked porcine dermis: report of a case.

Authors:  Alexander J Greenstein; Robert A Aldoroty
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Reoperation for stoma-related complications.

Authors:  Justin T Kim; Ravin R Kumar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

Review 10.  Parastomal hernia repair: laparoscopic ventral hernia meshplasty with stoma relocation. The current state and a clinical case presentation.

Authors:  L García-Vallejo; P Concheiro; E Mena; J Baltar; I Baamonde; L Folgar
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.