Literature DB >> 19321287

Use of and reactions to a tailored CD-ROM designed to enhance oncologist-patient communication: the SCOPE trial intervention.

Celette Sugg Skinner1, Kathryn I Pollak, David Farrell, Maren K Olsen, Amy S Jeffreys, James A Tulsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess use of and reactions to an interactive, tailored CD-ROM to enhance oncologist-patient communication.
METHODS: Participating oncologists (n=48) agreed to have patient interactions audio recorded, be randomly assigned to receive/not receive a CD-ROM, have CD-ROM usage monitored (intervention group) and complete a follow-up survey.
RESULTS: Twenty-one of 24 in the intervention group reported using the CD-ROM. Median usage minutes were 63.8. At follow-up, oncologists rated the CD-ROM from 1 ("none" or "not at all helpful") to 5 ("a great deal" or "very helpful"). Mean responses were: 3.1 and 3.0 for 2 items assessing perceived impact on communications, 3.8-4.0 for 6 items assessing perceived helpfulness, 3.0 and 3.10 for 2 items assessing impact on affecting oncologists' communication with patients and assistance with challenging conversations, respectively, and 3.6 for whether using the CD-ROM was worth their time. Self-report of how much oncologists had used the covered skills before and after intervention showed a perceived increase (2.8 before and 3.2 after).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest the tailored interactive CD-ROM has promise for use and acceptance among oncologists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If ultimately found effective in changing oncologist's communication with patients, the CD-ROM's widespread dissemination should be explored. 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321287      PMCID: PMC2841286          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  31 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Utilization of a pediatric emergency department education computer.

Authors:  M Pusic; K Johnson; A Duggan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-02

Review 3.  Motivational interviewing in substance abuse: applications for occupational medicine.

Authors:  Joseph H Miller; Theresa Moyers
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Clinical decision support provided within physician order entry systems: a systematic review of features effective for changing clinician behavior.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; David F Lobach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

5.  Web-based, virtual course units as a didactic concept for medical teaching.

Authors:  Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Thomas Zielinski; Jürgen Lochner
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Communication about the ending of anticancer treatment and transition to palliative care.

Authors:  T Morita; T Akechi; M Ikenaga; Y Kizawa; H Kohara; T Mukaiyama; T Nakaho; N Nakashima; Y Shima; T Matsubara; M Fujimori; Y Uchitomi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield; Valerie Jenkins; Vern Farewell; Jacky Saul; Anthony Duffy; Rebecca Eves
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues.

Authors:  P N Butow; R F Brown; S Cogar; M H N Tattersall; S M Dunn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  S J White; L S Freedman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program: a randomized trial.

Authors:  James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Keri L Rodriguez; Celette Sugg Skinner; David Farrell; Amy P Abernethy; Kathryn I Pollak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Teen CHAT: Development and utilization of a web-based intervention to improve physician communication with adolescents about healthy weight.

Authors:  Terrill Bravender; James A Tulsky; David Farrell; Stewart C Alexander; Truls Østbye; Pauline Lyna; Rowena J Dolor; Cynthia J Coffman; Alicia Bilheimer; Pao-Hwa Lin; Kathryn I Pollak
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-23

3.  Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Adam Buchanan; Victoria Champion; Patrick Monahan; Susan Rawl; Jeffrey Springston; Zhao Qianqian; Sara Bourff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-26

4.  Redefining the "planning" in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; Terri R Fried
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Barriers to end-of-life care for African Americans from the providers' perspective: opportunity for intervention development.

Authors:  Ramona L Rhodes; Kim Batchelor; Simon C Lee; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  Closing the patient-oncologist communication gap: a review of historic and current efforts.

Authors:  A Khoa Pham; Marianne T Bauer; Stefan Balan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Do patient attributes predict oncologist empathic responses and patient perceptions of empathy?

Authors:  Kathryn I Pollak; Robert Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Amy P Abernethy; Keri L Rodriguez; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Mobile Technology-Based (mLearning) Intervention to Enhance Breast Cancer Clinicians' Communication About Sexual Health: A Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Lauren A Zimmaro; Sharon L Bober; Kristen Sorice; Elizabeth Handorf; Elaine Wittenberg; Areej El-Jawahri; Mary Catherine Beach; Antonio C Wolff; Mary B Daly; Brynna Izquierdo; Stephen J Lepore
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Empathy and boundary turbulence in cancer communication.

Authors:  Susan H McDaniel; Diane S Morse; Elizabeth A Edwardsen; Adam Taupin; Mary Gale Gurnsey; Jennifer J Griggs; Cleveland G Shields; Shmuel Reis
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 10.  Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.

Authors:  Philippa M Moore; Solange Rivera; Gonzalo A Bravo-Soto; Camila Olivares; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.