Literature DB >> 19319610

Utilizing a simulated tendon to teach tendon repair technique.

J M Ingraham1, R A Weber, R A Weber.   

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of teaching core tendon repairs using a simulation model, ten surgical residents with no prior experience repairing flexor tendons were taught a four-strand cruciate repair. The residents then performed ten repairs each on a simulated tendon (a round synthetic bait worm 10 mm in diameter) while being timed and graded by a hand surgeon using a global rating scale (1 to 5). Six residents also performed a zone IV flexor tendon repair on a fresh frozen cadaver--three residents who had practiced and three other residents who had no practice on the simulated tendon. The mean initial quality score was 2.4/5.0 which improved to 4.8/5.0 by the tenth trial. There was a significant incremental improvement in mean performance from trial 1 to 10 (p < 0.0001). The mean times to complete the first and last repairs were 5.4 and 3.0 min, respectively. In the cadaver trial, there was statistically significant evidence (p = 0.05, one-sided Wilcoxon exact test) that the three residents previously trained with the simulated tendon had a higher median performance (4.4, min = 4.3, max = 4.8) than the three who had not been trained (1.8, min = 1.7, max = 2.1). The mean times to complete the repairs were 4.0 and 5.8 min, respectively. In conclusion, this inexpensive model mimics an in vivo tendon repair experience with sufficient fidelity to justify its use in training residents to perform a tendon repair.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19319610      PMCID: PMC2686799          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-009-9184-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  E McLarney; H Hoffman; S W Wolfe
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill.

Authors:  Ethan D Grober; Stanley J Hamstra; Kyle R Wanzel; Richard K Reznick; Edward D Matsumoto; Ravindar S Sidhu; Keith A Jarvi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Pamela B Andreatta; Derek T Woodrum; John D Birkmeyer; Rajani K Yellamanchilli; Gerard M Doherty; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Rabih A Chaer; Brian G Derubertis; Stephanie C Lin; Harry L Bush; John K Karwowski; Daniel Birk; Nicholas J Morrissey; Peter L Faries; James F McKinsey; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Does a surgical simulator improve resident operative performance of laparoscopic tubal ligation?

Authors:  Erika H Banks; Scott Chudnoff; Ira Karmin; Cuiling Wang; Setul Pardanani
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Should simulator-based endovascular training be integrated into general surgery residency programs?

Authors:  Marc A Passman; Paul S Fleser; Jeffery B Dattilo; Raul J Guzman; Thomas C Naslund
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Simulation enhances resident confidence in critical care and procedural skills.

Authors:  James M Cooke; Janet Larsen; Stanley J Hamstra; Pamela B Andreatta
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  The new ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; Gary L Dunnington
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Teaching technical skills: training on a simple, inexpensive, and portable model.

Authors:  Kyle R Wanzel; Edward D Matsumoto; Stanley J Hamstra; Dimitri J Anastakis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.730

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Can surgical skills be taught using technological advances online? A comparative study of online and face-to-face surgical skills training.

Authors:  Matyas Fehervari; Bibek Das; Payam Soleimani-Nouri; Manal Ahmad; Michael G Fadel; Mohammed Deputy; Catrin Morgan; Joshua R Burke; John D Mason; David Nott; Duncan Spalding
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.