Literature DB >> 19319384

Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy: a literature review and pilot study.

L Chartier1, E Arthurs, M J Sewitch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that colonoscopic colorectal cancer screening be undertaken every 10 years after the age of 50 years. However, because the procedure does not meet criteria that promote screening uptake, patient satisfaction with colonoscopy may encourage repeat screening.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature and conduct a pilot study of patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy experience.
METHODS: All cohort studies from January 1997 to August 2008 in the MEDLINE database that measured either patient satisfaction with colonoscopy, patient willingness to return for colonoscopy under the same conditions or patient preference for colonoscopy compared with other large bowel procedures were identified. The search was supplemented by journal citation lists in the retrieved articles.
RESULTS: Of the 29 studies identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Consistently, the vast majority of patients (approximately 95%) were very satisfied with their colonoscopy experience. Patient satisfaction was similar for screening and nonscreening colonoscopy. Patient willingness to return for the procedure ranged from 73% to 100%. Of the five studies that examined modality preference, three studies reported the majority of patients preferred colonography to colonoscopy and two studies reported the reverse. Our pilot study findings mirrored those of other studies that were conducted in the United States. The major limitation of the included studies was that patients who were most dissatisfied may have gone elsewhere to have their colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients were very satisfied with colonoscopy. The majority were willing to return for repeat testing under the same conditions, and colonoscopy was not preferred over other modalities. However, studies were limited by methodological shortcomings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19319384      PMCID: PMC2694655          DOI: 10.1155/2009/903545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  54 in total

1.  Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  B S Ling; M A Moskowitz; D Wachs; B Pearson; P C Schroy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population.

Authors:  Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; William S Harmsen; Kenneth P Offord; Ann M Harris; Lynn A Wilson; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.

Authors:  Rogier E van Gelder; Erwin Birnie; Jasper Florie; Michiel P Schutter; Joep F Bartelsman; Pleun Snel; Johan S Laméris; Gouke J Bonsel; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Pertinence of a pre-colonoscopy consultation for routine information delivery.

Authors:  Pascal Vignally; Stéphanie Gentile; Fanny Grimaud; Sébastien Ousset; Véronique Vitton; Roland Sambuc; Jean-Charles Grimaud
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2007-12

7.  Patient satisfaction scores for endoscopic procedures: impact of a survey-collection method.

Authors:  Otto S Lin; Drew B Schembre; Kamran Ayub; Michael Gluck; Susan E McCormick; David J Patterson; Nico Cantone; Maw-Soan Soon; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program.

Authors:  U A Marbet; P Bauerfeind; J Brunner; G Dorta; J J Valloton; F Delcò
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation.

Authors:  Stephen L Ristvedt; Elizabeth G McFarland; Leonard B Weinstock; Eric P Thyssen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  10 in total

1.  Dynamic position change at colonoscopy improves adenoma detection.

Authors:  Subrata Ghosh; Marietta Iacucci
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  A literature review of quality in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Shasha Gong; Catherine Dube; Alan Barkun; Robert Hilsden; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Comparison of double pants with single pants on satisfaction with colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sook Hee Chung; Soo Jung Park; Jong Suk Hong; Jee Young Hwang; Sin Ae Lee; Kyung Ran Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Sung Pil Hong; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Is "really conscious" sedation with solely an opioid an alternative to every day used sedation regimes for colonoscopies in a teaching hospital? Midazolam/fentanyl, propofol/alfentanil, or alfentanil only for colonoscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Eberl; J A W Polderman; B Preckel; C J Kalkman; P Fockens; M W Hollmann
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Analgesia without sedatives during colonoscopies: worth considering?

Authors:  S Eberl; B Preckel; P Fockens; M W Hollmann
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  The effectiveness of FOBT vs. FIT: A meta-analysis on colorectal cancer screening test.

Authors:  Maryam Mousavinezhad; Reza Majdzadeh; Ali Akbari Sari; Alireza Delavari; Farideh Mohtasham
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-05-09

7.  Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hind T Hatoum; Swu-Jane Lin; Raymond E Joseph; David N Dahdal
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.

Authors:  E M Stoop; T R de Wijkerslooth; P M Bossuyt; J Stoker; P Fockens; E J Kuipers; E Dekker; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Long-term patient satisfaction of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Maria Triantafyllou; Xhoela Ndini; Anastasia Melissaratou; Giannis-Aimant Moustafa; Eleni Xanthopoulou; Georgios Tziatzios; Georgia Vlachonikolou; Vasilios Papadopoulos; Evdoxos Pantelakis; Chrysoula Malli; George D Dimitriadis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study.

Authors:  Alicia Brotons; Mercedes Guilabert; Francisco Javier Lacueva; José Joaquín Mira; Blanca Lumbreras; María Dolores Picó; Julián Vitaller; Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre; Germán Belda; Javier Sola-Vera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.