Literature DB >> 19307569

Auditory recognition memory is inferior to visual recognition memory.

Michael A Cohen1, Todd S Horowitz, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

Visual memory for scenes is surprisingly robust. We wished to examine whether an analogous ability exists in the auditory domain. Participants listened to a variety of sound clips and were tested on their ability to distinguish old from new clips. Stimuli ranged from complex auditory scenes (e.g., talking in a pool hall) to isolated auditory objects (e.g., a dog barking) to music. In some conditions, additional information was provided to help participants with encoding. In every situation, however, auditory memory proved to be systematically inferior to visual memory. This suggests that there exists either a fundamental difference between auditory and visual stimuli, or, more plausibly, an asymmetry between auditory and visual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19307569      PMCID: PMC2667065          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811884106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  How many pixels make an image?

Authors:  Antonio Torralba
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Learning 10,000 pictures.

Authors:  L Standing
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Picture memory experiments.

Authors:  K Dallett; S G Wilcox; L D'Andrea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-02

4.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  36 in total

1.  Monkey׳s short-term auditory memory nearly abolished by combined removal of the rostral superior temporal gyrus and rhinal cortices.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Megan Malloy; Mortimer Mishkin; Richard C Saunders
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Auditory to Visual Cross-Modal Adaptation for Emotion: Psychophysical and Neural Correlates.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Xiaotao Guo; Lin Chen; Yijun Liu; Michael E Goldberg; Hong Xu
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

4.  Radiologists remember mountains better than radiographs, or do they?

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Edith M Marom; Myrna C B Godoy; Diana Palacio; Tara Sagebiel; Sonia Betancourt Cuellar; Mark McEntee; Charles Tian; Patrick C Brennan; Tamara Miner Haygood
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 5.  A multisensory perspective on object memory.

Authors:  Pawel J Matusz; Mark T Wallace; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Neural circuits in auditory and audiovisual memory.

Authors:  B Plakke; L M Romanski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Bethany Plakke; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Commonalities of visual and auditory working memory in a spatial-updating task.

Authors:  Tomoki Maezawa; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-22

10.  The C957T polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D₂ gene modulates domain-general category learning.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.