Literature DB >> 19306751

Comparison of biological effectiveness of carbon-ion beams in Japan and Germany.

Akiko Uzawa1, Koichi Ando, Sachiko Koike, Yoshiya Furusawa, Yoshitaka Matsumoto, Nobuhiko Takai, Ryoichi Hirayama, Masahiko Watanabe, Michael Scholz, Thilo Elsässer, Peter Peschke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the biological effectiveness of 290 MeV/amu carbon-ion beams in Chiba, Japan and in Darmstadt, Germany, given that different methods for beam delivery are used for each. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Murine small intestine and human salivary gland tumor (HSG) cells exponentially growing in vitro were irradiated with 6-cm width of spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs) adjusted to achieve nearly identical beam depth-dose profiles at the Heavy-Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba, and the SchwerIonen Synchrotron in Darmstadt. Cell kill efficiencies of carbon ions were measured by colony formation for HSG cells and jejunum crypts survival in mice. Cobalt-60 gamma rays were used as the reference radiation. Isoeffective doses at given survivals were used for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculations and interinstitutional comparisons.
RESULTS: Isoeffective D(10) doses (mean +/- standard deviation) of HSG cells ranged from 2.37 +/- 0.14 Gy to 3.47 +/- 0.19 Gy for Chiba and from 2.31 +/- 0.11 Gy to 3.66 +/- 0.17 Gy for Darmstadt. Isoeffective D(10) doses of gut crypts after single doses ranged from 8.25 +/- 0.17 Gy to 10.32 +/- 0.14 Gy for Chiba and from 8.27 +/- 0.10 Gy to 10.27 +/- 0.27 Gy for Darmstadt, whereas isoeffective D(30) doses after three fractionated doses were 9.89 +/- 0.17 Gy through 13.70 +/- 0.54 Gy and 10.14 +/- 0.20 Gy through 13.30 +/- 0.41 Gy for Chiba and Darmstadt, respectively. Overall difference of RBE between the two facilities was 0-5% or 3-7% for gut crypt survival or HSG cell kill, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The carbon-ion beams at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in Chiba, Japan and the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung in Darmstadt, Germany are biologically identical after single and daily fractionated irradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306751     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  The potential impact of relative biological effectiveness uncertainty on charged particle treatment prescriptions.

Authors:  B Jones; T S A Underwood; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Heavy charged particle radiobiology: using enhanced biological effectiveness and improved beam focusing to advance cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Allen; Thomas B Borak; Hirohiko Tsujii; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Performance Evaluation for Repair of HSGc-C5 Carcinoma Cell Using Geant4-DNA.

Authors:  Dousatsu Sakata; Masao Suzuki; Ryoichi Hirayama; Yasushi Abe; Masayuki Muramatsu; Shinji Sato; Oleg Belov; Ioanna Kyriakou; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Susanna Guatelli; Sebastien Incerti; Taku Inaniwa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Charged particles in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Review of carbon ion radiotherapy for skull base tumors (especially chordomas).

Authors:  Jun-Etsu Mizoe
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-02-20

6.  The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Vicki T Taasti; Andrew Jackson; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Basics of particle therapy II: relative biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Jinhyun Choi; Jin Oh Kang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2012-03-31

8.  Microdosimetric calculation of relative biological effectiveness for design of therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  Yuki Kase; Wataru Yamashita; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Kenta Takada; Takeji Sakae; Yoshiya Furusawa; Haruo Yamashita; Shigeyuki Murayama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Enhanced radiobiological effects at the distal end of a clinical proton beam: in vitro study.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Taeko Matsuura; Mami Wada; Yusuke Egashira; Teiji Nishio; Yoshiya Furusawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  RBE and OER within the spread-out Bragg peak for proton beam therapy: in vitro study at the Proton Medical Research Center at the University of Tsukuba.

Authors:  Ayae Kanemoto; Ryoichi Hirayama; Takashi Moritake; Yoshiya Furusawa; Lue Sun; Takeji Sakae; Akihiro Kuno; Toshiyuki Terunuma; Kiyoshi Yasuoka; Yutaro Mori; Koji Tsuboi; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.