Literature DB >> 19306746

Larynx preservation clinical trial design: key issues and recommendations-a consensus panel summary.

Jean-Louis Lefebvre1, K Kian Ang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop guidelines for the conduct of Phase III clinical trials of larynx preservation in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multidisciplinary international consensus panel developed recommendations after reviewing results from completed Phase III randomized trials, meta-analyses, and published clinical reports with updates available through November, 2007. The guidelines were reviewed and approved by the panel.
RESULTS: According to the recommendations, the trial population should include patients with T2 or T3 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma not considered for partial laryngectomy and exclude those with laryngeal dysfunction or age greater than 70 years. Functional assessments should include speech and swallowing. Voice should be routinely assessed with a simple, validated instrument. The primary endpoint should capture survival and function. The panel created a new endpoint: laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival. Events are death, local relapse, total or partial laryngectomy, tracheotomy at 2 years or later, or feeding tube at 2 years or later. Recommended secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional control, time to tracheotomy, time to laryngectomy, time to discontinuation of feeding tube, and quality of life/patient-reported outcomes. Correlative biomarker studies for near-term trials should include estimated glomerular filtration rate, excision repair cross-complementary-1 gene, E-cadherin and beta-catenin, epiregulin and amphiregulin, and TP53 mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Revised trial designs in several key areas are needed to advance the study of larynx preservation. With consistent methodologies, clinical trials can more effectively evaluate and quantify the therapeutic benefit of novel treatment options for patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306746     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  35 in total

1.  [Multimodal laryngeal preservation: current data-based opinion].

Authors:  A Dietz; A Boehm; G Wichmann; D Niederwieser; S Dietzsch; M Fuchs
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Usefulness of ultrasonography in assessment of laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  C-X Xia; Q Zhu; H-X Zhao; F Yan; S-L Li; S-M Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Organ preservation vs primary surgery in the management of T3 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Sudhir Vasudevan Nair; Manish Mair; Noopur Sawarkar; Swagnik Chakrabarti; Burhanuddin Qayyumi; Deepa Nair; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Tejpal Gupta; Jai Prakash Agrawal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Endpoints and cutpoints in head and neck oncology trials: methodical background, challenges, current practice and perspectives.

Authors:  Marcus Hezel; Kathrin von Usslar; Thiemo Kurzweg; Balazs B Lörincz; Rainald Knecht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  A comparison of swallowing dysfunction after three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy : A systematic review by the Italian Head and Neck Radiotherapy Study Group.

Authors:  Stefano Ursino; Elisa D'Angelo; Rosario Mazzola; Anna Merlotti; Riccardo Morganti; Agostino Cristaudo; Fabiola Paiar; Daniela Musio; Daniela Alterio; Almalina Bacigalupo; Elvio Grazioso Russi; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Nutritional status and feeding-tube placement in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer included in an induction chemotherapy-based larynx preservation program.

Authors:  Alexandre Bozec; Karen Benezery; Emmanuel Chamorey; Marc Ettaiche; Clair Vandersteen; Olivier Dassonville; Gilles Poissonnet; Jean-Christophe Riss; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi; Marie-Eve Chand; Axel Leysalle; Esma Saada; Anne Sudaka; Juliette Haudebourg; Christophe Hebert; Marie-Noelle Falewee; François Demard; José Santini; Frédéric Peyrade
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Inhibitory action of chamaejasmin A against human HEP-2 epithelial cells: effect on tubulin protein.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Fenglian Wu; Yu Wang; Shengwu Chen; Guojun Han; Ming Liu; Dejun Jin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 8.  Chemoselection: a paradigm for optimization of organ preservation in locally advanced larynx cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Vivian F Wu; Matthew E Spector; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Francis P Worden
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.512

9.  Assay-based response evaluation in head and neck oncology: requirements for better decision making.

Authors:  Andreas Dietz; Andreas Boehm; Iris-Susanne Horn; Pierre Kruber; Ingo Bechmann; Wojciech Golusinski; Dietger Niederwieser; Ralph Dollner; Torsten W Remmerbach; Christian Wittekind; Stephan Dietzsch; Guido Hildebrandt; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Surgery for Laryngopharyngeal SCC in the Era of Organ Preservation.

Authors:  Jean Louis Lefebvre
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.