Literature DB >> 25573834

Endpoints and cutpoints in head and neck oncology trials: methodical background, challenges, current practice and perspectives.

Marcus Hezel1, Kathrin von Usslar2, Thiemo Kurzweg3, Balazs B Lörincz3, Rainald Knecht4.   

Abstract

This article reviews the methodical and statistical basics of designing a trial, with a special focus on the process of defining and choosing endpoints and cutpoints as the foundations of clinical research, and ultimately that of evidence-based medicine. There has been a significant progress in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the past few decades. Currently available treatment options can have a variety of different goals, depending e.g. on tumor stage, among other factors. The outcome of a specific treatment in clinical trials is measured using endpoints. Besides classical endpoints, such as overall survival or organ preservation, other endpoints like quality of life are becoming increasingly important in designing and conducting a trial. The present work is based on electronic research and focuses on the solid methodical and statistical basics of a clinical trial, on the structure of study designs and on the presentation of various endpoints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical study; Clinical trial; Cutpoint; Endpoint; Good practice; Head and neck cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25573834     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3472-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  44 in total

1.  Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.

Authors:  J A Sterne; D Gavaghan; M Egger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  American society of clinical oncology statement: toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Thomas J Smith; Paul R Helft; David J Debono; Scott R Berry; Dana S Wollins; Daniel M Hayes; Jamie H Von Roenn; Lowell E Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Prognostic biomarkers of survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James W Rainsbury; Waseem Ahmed; Hazel K Williams; Sally Roberts; Vinidh Paleri; Hisham Mehanna
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Transoral resection of pharyngeal cancer: summary of a National Cancer Institute Head and Neck Cancer Steering Committee Clinical Trials Planning Meeting, November 6-7, 2011, Arlington, Virginia.

Authors:  David J Adelstein; John A Ridge; David M Brizel; F Christopher Holsinger; Bruce H Haughey; Brian O'Sullivan; Eric M Genden; Jonathan J Beitler; Gregory S Weinstein; Harry Quon; Douglas B Chepeha; Robert L Ferris; Randal S Weber; Benjamin Movsas; John Waldron; Val Lowe; Scott Ramsey; Judith Manola; Bevan Yueh; Thomas E Carey; Justin E Bekelman; Andre A Konski; Eric Moore; Arlene Forastiere; David E Schuller; Jean Lynn; Claudio Dansky Ullmann
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 5.  Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials.

Authors:  Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008

6.  Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in locally advanced head and neck cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data.

Authors:  Stefan Michiels; Aurélie Le Maître; Marc Buyse; Tomasz Burzykowski; Emilie Maillard; Jan Bogaerts; Jan B Vermorken; Wilfried Budach; Thomas F Pajak; Kian K Ang; Jean Bourhis; Jean-Pierre Pignon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Issues in using progression-free survival when evaluating oncology products.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Mark D Rothmann; Hong Laura Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D for the assessment of cancer patients.

Authors:  Seon Ha Kim; Min-Woo Jo; Hwa-Jung Kim; Jin-Hee Ahn
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; Marc Buyse; Ruth Garside; Toby Pavey; Ken Stein; Jonathan A C Sterne; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-29

10.  Results of concurrent radio-chemotherapy for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in everyday clinical practice with special reference to early mortality.

Authors:  Michael Schlumpf; Claude Fischer; Diana Naehrig; Christoph Rochlitz; Martin Buess
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  Feasibility of assessing pulmonary blood volume using C-arm CT during transpulmonary chemoperfusion and chemoembolization in primary and secondary lung tumours.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Nagy N N Naguib; Thomas Lehnert; Hanns Ackermann; Renate Hammerstingl; Marcus Hezel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.