PURPOSE: To use functional MRI (fMRI) methods to visualize a network of auditory and language-processing brain regions associated with processing an aurally-presented story. We compare a passive listening (PL) story paradigm to an active-response (AR) version including online performance monitoring and a sparse acquisition technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty children (ages 11-13 years) completed PL and AR story processing tasks. The PL version presented alternating 30-second blocks of stories and tones; the AR version presented story segments, comprehension questions, and 5-second tone sequences, with fMRI acquisitions between stimuli. fMRI data was analyzed using a general linear model approach and paired t-test identifying significant group activation. RESULTS: Both tasks showed activation in the primary auditory cortex, superior temporal gyrus bilaterally, and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). The AR task demonstrated more extensive activation, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior/posterior cingulate cortex. Comparison of effect size in each paradigm showed a larger effect for the AR paradigm in a left inferior frontal region-of-interest (ROI). CONCLUSION: Activation patterns for story processing in children are similar in PL and AR tasks. Increases in extent and magnitude of activation in the AR task are likely associated with memory and attention resources engaged across acquisition intervals.
PURPOSE: To use functional MRI (fMRI) methods to visualize a network of auditory and language-processing brain regions associated with processing an aurally-presented story. We compare a passive listening (PL) story paradigm to an active-response (AR) version including online performance monitoring and a sparse acquisition technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty children (ages 11-13 years) completed PL and AR story processing tasks. The PL version presented alternating 30-second blocks of stories and tones; the AR version presented story segments, comprehension questions, and 5-second tone sequences, with fMRI acquisitions between stimuli. fMRI data was analyzed using a general linear model approach and paired t-test identifying significant group activation. RESULTS: Both tasks showed activation in the primary auditory cortex, superior temporal gyrus bilaterally, and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). The AR task demonstrated more extensive activation, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior/posterior cingulate cortex. Comparison of effect size in each paradigm showed a larger effect for the AR paradigm in a left inferior frontal region-of-interest (ROI). CONCLUSION: Activation patterns for story processing in children are similar in PL and AR tasks. Increases in extent and magnitude of activation in the AR task are likely associated with memory and attention resources engaged across acquisition intervals.
Authors: J L Ulmer; B B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; L P Mark; V P Mathews; R W Prost; L D Estkowski; T L McAuliffe; V M Haughton; D L Daniels Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Weihong Yuan; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Vincent J Schmithorst; Mark Schapiro; Anna W Byars; Richard H Strawsburg; Scott K Holland Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jerzy P Szaflarski; David Gloss; Jeffrey R Binder; William D Gaillard; Alexandra J Golby; Scott K Holland; Jeffrey Ojemann; David C Spencer; Sara J Swanson; Jacqueline A French; William H Theodore Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Milena Korostenskaja; Po-Ching Chen; Christine M Salinas; Michael Westerveld; Peter Brunner; Gerwin Schalk; Jane C Cook; James Baumgartner; Ki H Lee Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Vincent J Schmithorst; Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Jennifer Vannest; Akila Rajagopal; Greg Lee; Scott K Holland Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: John S Hutton; Kieran Phelan; Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus; Jonathan Dudley; Mekibib Altaye; Tom DeWitt; Scott K Holland Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Richard E Frye; Benjamin Malmberg; John McLean; Paul Swank; Karen Smith; Andrew Papanicolaou; Susan Landry Journal: Brain Res Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Mark W DiFrancesco; Sara A Robertson; Prasanna Karunanayaka; Scott K Holland Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jennifer Vannest; Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Vincent J Schmithorst; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Scott K Holland Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.959