Literature DB >> 19305654

Commentary: whose views count in evidence synthesis? And when do they count?

Jonathan Lomas1.   

Abstract

Four recent pieces in Healthcare Policy reveal some disagreement on when and how to involve decision-makers in the process of evidence synthesis. This commentary proposes varying roles for researchers versus managers or policy makers at each of three different stages of synthesis and at the actual point of decision. It also raises the issue of how poorly current processes accommodate the broader conception of evidence held by most managers and policy makers.

Year:  2006        PMID: 19305654      PMCID: PMC2585327     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  4 in total

1.  Informing policy making and management in healthcare: the place for synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Pope; Nicholas Mays; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

2.  Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2005-09

3.  Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Huw T O Davies; Russell L Gruen; Kieran Walshe; Cynthia M Farquhar
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

4.  Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in the policy making drama.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  The research collective: a model for developing timely, contextually relevant and dynamic approaches to research synthesis?

Authors:  Charlyn Black
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-05

2.  Researchers' role in policy decision-making: purveyors of evidence, purveyors of ideas?

Authors:  Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

3.  We know accurately only when we know little.

Authors:  Stuart MacLeod; Craig Mitton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Health systems integration: state of the evidence.

Authors:  Gail D Armitage; Esther Suter; Nelly D Oelke; Carol E Adair
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Use of a knowledge synthesis by decision makers and planners to facilitate system level integration in a large Canadian provincial health authority.

Authors:  Esther Suter; Gail D Armitage
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.

Authors:  Sara Khangura; Kristin Konnyu; Rob Cushman; Jeremy Grimshaw; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-10

7.  Engaging knowledge users in development of the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Mark Petticrew; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Manosila Yoganathan; Jennifer Petkovic; Peter Tugwell; Vivian Welch
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.